期刊文献+

Benefits and limitations of middle bile duct segmental resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

下载PDF
导出
摘要 Background:Pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD)is a standardized strategy for patients with middle and distal bile duct cancers.The aim of this study was to compare clinicopathological features of bile duct segmen-tal resection(BDR)with PD in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Methods:Consecutive cases with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent BDR(n=21)or PD(n=84)with achievement of R0 or R1 resection in Kobe University Hospital between January 2000 and December 2016 were enrolled in the present study.Results:Patients who underwent PD were significantly younger than those receiving BDR.The frequency of preoperative jaundice,biliary drainage and cholangitis was not significantly different between the two groups.The duration of surgery was longer and there was more intraoperative bleeding in the PD than in the BDR group(553 vs.421 min,and 770 vs.402 mL;both P<0.01).More major complications(>Clavien-DindoⅢa)were observed in the PD group(46%vs.10%,P<0.01).Postoperative hospital stay was also longer in that group(30 vs.19 days,P=0.02).Pathological assessment revealed that tumors were less advanced in the BDR group but the rate of lymph node metastasis was similar in both groups(33%in BDR and 48%in PD,P=0.24).The rate of R0 resection was significantly higher in the PD group(80%vs.38%,P<0.01).Adjuvant chemotherapy was more frequently administered to patients in the BDR group(62%vs.38%,P=0.04).Although 5-year overall survival rates were similar in both groups(44%for BDR and 51%for PD,P=0.72),in patients with T1 and T2,the BDR group tended to have poorer prognosis(44%vs.68%at 5-year,P=0.09).Conclusions:BDR was comparable in prognosis to PD in middle bile duct cancer.Less invasiveness and lower morbidity of BDR justified this technique for selected patients in a poor general condition.
出处 《Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2020年第2期147-152,共6页 国际肝胆胰疾病杂志(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1Bismuth H,Corlette MB.Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1975; 140:170-178.
  • 2Hadjis NS,Blenkharn JI,Alexander N,Benjamin IS,Blumgart LH.Outcome of radical surgery in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.Surgery 1990; 107:597-604.
  • 3Klempnauer J,Ridder GJ,von Wasielewski R,Werner M,Weimann A,Pichlmayr R.Resectional surgery of hilar cholangiocarcinoma:a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors.J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:947-954.
  • 4Pichlmayr R,Weimann A,Klempnauer J,Oldhafer KJ,Maschek H,Tusch G,Ringe B.Surgical treatment in proximal bile duct cancer.A single-center experience.Ann Surg 1996;224:628-638.
  • 5Burke EC,Jarnagin WR,Hochwald SN,Pisters PW,Fong Y,Blumgart LH.Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma:patterns of spread,the importance of hepatic resection for curative operation,and a presurgical clinical staging system.Ann Surg 1998; 228:385-394.
  • 6Chamberlain RS,Blumgart LH.Hilar cholangiocarcinoma:a review and commentary.Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7:55-66.
  • 7Fong Y,Blumgart LH,Lin E,Fortner JG,Brennan MF.Outcome of treatment for distal bile duct cancer.Br J Surg 1996; 83:1712-1715.
  • 8Kayahara M,Nagakawa T,Ohta T,Kitagawa H,Tajima H,Miwa K.Role of nodal involvement and the periductal softtissue margin in middle and distal bile duct cancer.Ann Surg 1999; 229:76-83.
  • 9Murakami Y,Uemura K,Hayashidani Y,Sudo T,Hashimoto Y,Ohge H,Sueda T.Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis and surgical margin status for distal cholangiocarcinoma.J Surg Oncol 2007; 95:207-212.
  • 10Sakamoto Y,Kosuge T,Shimada K,Sano T,Ojima H,Yamamoto J,Yamasaki S,Takayama T,Makuuchi M.Prognostic factors of surgical resection in middle and distal bile duct cancer:an analysis of 55 patients concerning the significance of ductal and radial margins.Surgery 2005; 137:396-402.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部