期刊文献+

科学推理能力和创造力调查分析——以宁夏大学2018级学科教学(物理)班为例

Diagnoses of Scientific Reasoning Ability and Creativity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 测试采用Lawson科学推理能力测试量表和尤金劳德赛创造力测试量表对宁夏大学2018级学科教学(物理)班38人的科学推理能力和创造力进行测试。通过对试题内容的统计分析、成绩特征值分析及相关系数计算,以期了解大学生科学推理能力和创造力现状,分析当前教学在培养学生科学推理能力和创造力等方面存在的问题并提出相关建议。 In this paper, the Lawson Scientific Reasoning Ability Test Scale and Eugene Lauder Creativity Test Scale are used to test the scientific reasoning ability and creativity of 38 students in the 2018 grade subject teaching(physics) class of Ningxia University. Through the statistical analysis of the content of the test questions, the analysis of the eigenvalues of the scores, and the calculation of the related coefficients, this paper aims to understand the present situation of the scientific reasoning ability and creativity of college students, analyzes the problems existing in the cultivation of students’ scientific reasoning ability and creativity in the current teaching, and puts forward some relevant suggestions.
作者 高院丽 杨晓梅 GAO Yuanli;YANG Xiaomei
出处 《中国教育技术装备》 2019年第22期19-20,29,共3页 China Educational Technology & Equipment
关键词 科学推理 创造力 物理 试题内容 scientific reasoning creativity physics content of test questions
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1Lawson A E. The Development and Validation of A Classroom Test of formal Reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1978, 15(1): 11-24.
  • 2Lawson A E, Alkhoury S, Benford R, et al. What Kinds of Scientific Concepts Exist? Concept Construction and Intellectual Development in College Biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2000, 37(9): 996-1018.
  • 3Inhelder B, Piaget J. The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic, 1958.
  • 4Adi H, Karplus R, Lawson A E. Development of Correlational Reasoning in Secondary Schools: Do Biology Courses Make a Difference?. The American Biology Teacher. 1979, 41 (7): 420- 425.
  • 5Cardellini L. An Interview with Anton E. Lawson. The American Biology Teacher. 2005, 67(3) : 140 - 148.
  • 6Lawson A E, Johnson M. The Validity of Kolb Learning Styles and Neo - Piagetian Developmental Levels in College Biology. Studies in Higher Education. 2002, 27(1): 79-90.
  • 7Benford R, Lawson A E. Relationships Between Effective Inquiry Use and the Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills in College Biology Labs. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 2001.
  • 8Coletta V P, Phillips J A, Interpreting force concept inventory scores: Normalized gain and SAT scores. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. 2007, 3(1) : 1 - 6.
  • 9Lawson A E, Clark B, Crarner- Meldrum E, et al. Development of Scientific Reasoning in College Biology: Do Two Levels of General Hypothesis - Testing Skills Exist? Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2000, 37(1) : 81 - 101.
  • 10杨燕,郭玉英,魏昕,杨保和,环敏.高师理科教学与学生科学推理能力的培养[J].教育学报,2010,6(2):42-47. 被引量:22

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部