透視多主體實施方法專利——兼評騰達案

Dissection of Method Patents Performed by Multiple Entities——Comment on the Tengda Case

2019年歲末,最高人民法院對深圳敦駿科技有限公司訴深圳市吉祥騰達科技有限公司侵害發明專利權案(以下簡稱"騰達案")作出的二審判决~1引起業界對多主體實施方法專利的再度關注。判决中特别提及了通信領域的特點,即"互聯互通、信息共享、多方協作、持續創新等特點,這就决定了該領域中的絶大多數發明創造的類型爲方法專利,且往往只能撰寫成爲需要多個主體的參與才能實施的方法專利,或者採用此種撰寫方式能更好地表達出發明的實質技術内容"。

At the end of 2019,the Supreme People's Court issued the sec on d-insta nee judgment 1 in Shenzhen Dunjun Technology Co.,Ltd.v.Shenzhen Jixiang Tengda Technology Co.,Ltd.(hereinafter referred to as the Tengda Case),which re-triggered great concern about a method pate nt performed by multiple entities.