冲突量刑情节适用原则的反思

Reflection to the Principles Applied to Sentencing Circumstances with Conflicts

刑事个案中多个量刑情节冲突为常见事态。《最高人民法院关于常见犯罪的量刑指导意见》试图通过量化的量刑范式为司法实践提供指引,如此做法的合理性值得商榷。在责任主义的视野之下,有效区分预防刑情节和报应刑情节在个案中的作用与影响,坚持罪刑均衡原则、一般与特殊相统一原则及基本公正原则是解决量刑情节冲突的可行之路。

It is common that multiple sentencing circumstances conflict in a criminal case. Sentencing guidance opinion attempts to provide guidance for judicial practice by quantitative paradigm, but the rationality of this approach is questionable. Based on perspective of Responsibilism, effectively distinguishing the function and influence of retributive and preventive circumstances in individual case, and adhering to the principle of equating crime with punishment, the principle of unifying the general and the special and the principle of basic fairness are feasible ways to resolve conflicts in sentencing circumstances.