期刊文献+

印度对国际核不扩散机制的政策现状及前景 被引量:1

India’s Policy on and Prospect of the International Nuclear Non-proliferation Regime
下载PDF
导出
摘要 1998年5月11日和13日,印度相继进行了5次核试验并公开宣布成为核武器国家。印度核试验对国际核不扩散机制构成了严重冲击,也遭到国际社会的一致谴责。至今,印度仍被国际核不扩散机制排除在外,尽管已是事实上的核武器国家,但并未获得法理上的承认,从而对印度谋求“有声有色的大国”地位形成掣肘。为此,印度积极调整对国际核不扩散机制的政策,缓和与该机制的关系,并且寻求融入机制,以期助力其大国地位追求。但在此过程中,印度的战略自主传统与国际机制的规则之间出现了结构性的矛盾,使其政策目标充满了极大的不确定性。 On May 11 and 13,1998,India conducted five nuclear tests and declared itself as a nuclear weapon state.The nuclear tests had serious impact on the international nuclear non-proliferation regime and were unanimously condemned by the international community.So far,India has been excluded from the international nuclear non-proliferation regime.Although it is a de facto nuclear-weapon state,it has not obtained legal recognition,which constrains on India’s pursuit of status of worldwide power proper.To this end,India actively adjusts its policies on the international nuclear non-proliferation regime,eases its relationship with the regime,and seeks to integrate it to help its pursuit of status as a major power.However,in the process,there has been a structural contradiction between India’s strategic autonomy and international regime,and its policy objectives are full of great uncertainty.
作者 王建党 WANG Jian-dang(College of International Studies,National University of Defense Technology,Nanjing Jiangsu 210039,China)
出处 《江南社会学院学报》 2020年第1期48-54,共7页 Journal of Jiangnan Social University
关键词 印度 国际核不扩散机制 政策 前景 India International Nuclear Non-proliferation Regime Policy Prospect
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

  • 1[1]Robert O.Keohane,International Institutions and State Power.Boulder:Westview Press,1989,p4.
  • 2[2]Van Ham,The lack of a Big Bully:Hegemonic Stability Theory and Regimes in the Study of International Relations,Acta Politico,No.27,1992,pp.29-48.
  • 3[4]Andreas Hasenclever,Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger,Theories of International regimes,Cambridge University Press,1997,p.90.
  • 4[5]Robert Cox,Approaches to World Order,Cambridge University Press,1996,pp.137-138.
  • 5[6]Andreas Hasenclever,Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger,Theories of International Regimes,Cambridge University Press,1997,pp.90-91.
  • 6[9]Andreas Hasenclever,Peter Mayer,Volker Rittberger,Theories of International Regimes,Cambridge University Press,1997,p.136.
  • 7[10]Wendt,The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory,International Organization,No.41,1987,p.363.
  • 8[11]Stephen Krasner (ed.) International Regimes,Cornell University Press,1983,p.62.
  • 9[12]Robert Keohane,After Hegemony,Princeton University Press.1984,p.132.
  • 10[14]Jonathan Mercer,Reputation and International Politics,Ithaca and London:Cornel University Press,1996,p.16.

共引文献6

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部