《正谊堂丛书》与《正谊堂全书》考论

The Study on the Zhengyi Tang Series and the Zhengyi Tang Quan Shu

世人对于康熙末《正谊堂丛书》和同光间《正谊堂全书》(尤其是前者)的子目多所不知,甚至还存在张冠李戴的情况。因据《张清恪公年谱》、《正谊堂文集》和《续集》、《正谊堂全书》第一册以及《中国古籍总目》等的相关记载,对康熙末《正谊堂丛书》的编纂和刊刻,以及同光间的重刻情况予以考证,并对二者的部类和子目变化加以比较分析,从而否定《中国古籍总目》等贻误他人的著录。二者的刊刻,对于清代正统理学的传播起到了十分重要的作用。

There is little knowledge about the categories of Zhengyi Tang Series and Zhengyi Tang Quan Shu by Zhang Boxing in the Kangxi Dynasty and by Zuo Zongtang between the Tongzhi Dynasty and Guangxu Dynasty respectively,which sometimes are even confused.According to the records of Chronology of Zhang Qingke,Collection of Zhengyi Tang,Sequel of Zhengyi Tang,Bibliography of Chinese Ancient Books,etc.,the paper studies on the compilation and publication of Zhengyi Tang Series in the Kangxi Dynasty,and the re-engraving of Zhengyi Tang Quan Shu between the Tongzhi Dynasty and Guangxu Dynasty.The engraving of these two series has their own specific historical background.There are differences in the categories and contents,too.The former includes 6 categories and 55 books,and the latter 7 categories and 68 books.The conclusion is that the records of Bibliography of Chinese Ancient Books are misleading.The engraving of these two series played an important role in the dissemination of orthodox science.