期刊文献+

海战伤院前急救训练中标准化伤员分级评价指标体系的实证研究 被引量:7

Empirical study of standardized wounded soldier grading evaluation indicator system in training of pre-hospital care for naval battle injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:将标准化伤员(standardized wounded soldier, SWS)分级评价指标体系分别应用于我海军部队和海军院校,以检验其有效性。方法:培训15个海军部队的30名战士担任基础级SWS,培训1所海军院校的6名学员担任专业级SWS。将指标体系转换为理论试卷和调查问卷2个部分进行验证。采用方便抽样法,选取救护员、课程导师及SWS 3类人群作为调查对象。结果:试卷的信度和区分度较好,难度适中。调查问卷整体具有较好的信效度。学员担任的专业级SWS总体评价优于战士扮演的基础级SWS。结论:SWS分级评价指标体系适宜可行,为合理评价SWS模拟质量、提高我军实战化训练效果提供了依据,有利于SWS在军事医学模拟领域中的推广和应用。 Objective To apply the standardized wounded soldier(SWS)grading evaluation indicator system in naval troops and naval colleges of China respectively to test its effectiveness.Methods A total of 30 soldiers from 15 naval troops were trained as basic-level SWS,and 6 students from a naval college were trained as professional-level SWS.The indicator system was verified in the form of knowledge questionnaire and quality report.Convenience sampling was used to select medics,instructors and SWS as subjects for evaluation.Results The reliability,discrimination and difficulty of the knowledge questionnaire were good,and the reliability and validity of quality report were good.The general evaluation of the professional-level SWS was better than that of the basic-level SWS.Conclusion SWS grading evaluation indicator system is suitable and feasible for reasonably evaluating the simulation quality of SWS and stepping up CPLA military training in real combat condition,and is conducive to promoting the popularization and application of SWS in military medical simulation training.
作者 朱思悦 王毅欣 黄燕 桂莉 Zhu Siyue;Wang Yixin;Huang Yan;Gui Li(Emergency Department,Second Medical Center,General Hospital of CPLA,Beijing 100853,China)
出处 《中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2020年第1期32-36,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nautical Medicine and Hyperbaric Medicine
基金 海军军医大学学位与研究生教育研究面上课题(海医办(2018)355号) "十三五"海军院校和训练机构教学创新团队建设项目(海参训(2017)70号) 军事医学创新工程(18CXZ009)。
关键词 标准化伤员 模拟伤员 战伤救治 模拟训练 效果评价 Standardized wounded soldier Simulated patient Combat casualty care Simulation training Effect evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献60

  • 1周继红,朱佩芳,杨志焕,刘良明,梁华平,黄显凯,董蕻,王正国.战伤定义与分类[J].人民军医,2008,51(1):1-2. 被引量:21
  • 2曾五一,黄炳艺.调查问卷的可信度和有效度分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2005,20(6):11-15. 被引量:362
  • 3喻荔琳,黄荔红,林丽英,陈春喜,黄永花,郑志钦.腹部战(创)伤标准化急救护理程序应用管理研究[J].福州总医院学报,2005,12(6):424-426. 被引量:2
  • 4秦浩,陈景武.医学量表条目的筛选考评方法及其应用[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(4):375-376. 被引量:176
  • 5张彦虎,段清梅,朱秀,吕长兴,江华,藤田佐和,铃木志津枝,郑修霞.中文版癌症生存者压力应对能力量表的建立[J].中国实用护理杂志,2007,23(3):1-4. 被引量:17
  • 6Boulet JR, Mckinley DW, Whelan GP, et al. Quality assurance methods for performance-based assessments. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract ,2003,8( 1 ) :2747.
  • 7Gay, L.R. (1996) Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Merrill, Prentice Hall.
  • 8Nunnally, J.(1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • 9Hauer K E, Chou C L, Souza K H, et al. hnpact of an In- Person Versus Web-Based Practice Standardized Patient Examination on Student Performance on a Subsequent High- Stakes Standardized Patient Examination [ J ]. Teaching & Learning in Medicine, 2009,21 (4) : 284-290.
  • 10Boulet J R, McKinley D W, Whelan G P, et al. Quality assurance methods /'or performance-based assessments [J].Advances in health sciences education, 2003,8( 1 ) :27-47.

共引文献140

同被引文献62

引证文献7

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部