期刊文献+

不同PICC置管方式对肿瘤化疗患者常见并发症的影响 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨分析不同PICC置管方式对肿瘤化疗患者常见并发症的影响。方法:抽取PICC置管的肿瘤化疗患者160例,按照置管方式的不同分为三组,分别进行传统盲穿法置管、改良塞丁格尔技术置管、超声引导下改良塞丁格尔技术置管,对比分析三组一次性置管成功率、导管相关并发症发生情况及非计划拔管率。结果:一次性置管成功率、非计划拔管率三组间比较均具统计学差异,P<0.05;且改良组与超声改良组均优于常规组,P<0.05;三组间各项导管相关并发症发生率比较差异均具统计学意义,P<0.05;且改良组与超声改良组各项导管相关并发症发生率均低于常规组,P<0.05。结论:相比于传统盲穿法PICC置管,给予肿瘤化疗患者改良塞丁格尔技术及超声引导,置管成功率更高,非计划拔管率与导管相关并发症发生率更低,具有临床推广价值。
作者 季霞 杜旭
出处 《医学食疗与健康》 2020年第6期143-144,共2页 Medical Diet and Health
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献51

  • 1杨婷婷.儿童经外周中心静脉置管留置时间的影响因素探讨[J].解放军护理杂志,2004,21(10):15-16. 被引量:5
  • 2丁小萍,夏彩莲,李红梅,刘娟,李文娟.外周置入中心静脉导管在血液病化疗患者中的应用[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(5):415-416. 被引量:91
  • 3Park JY1, Kim HL. A comprehensive review of clinical nurse specialist-led peripherally inserted central catheter placement in Korea: 4101 cases in a tertiary hospital [ J]. J Infus Nurs, 2015, 38 (2): 122-128.
  • 4Cotogni P1, Barbero C, Garrino C, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheters in non-hospitalized cancer patients: 5-year re- sults of a prospective study [ J ]. Support Care in Cancer, 2015, 23 (2): 403-409.
  • 5Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter (PICC) [ Internet ] Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU), 2011.
  • 6Mir6 J, Castarlenas E, de la Vega R, et al. Validity of three rating scales for measuring pain intensity in youths with physical disabilities [J]. EurJ Pain, 2015, 20 (1): 130-137.
  • 7Bortolussi R1, Zotti P2, Conte M3, et al. Quality of Life, Pain Perception, and Distress Correlated to Ultrasound-Guided Pe- ripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in Palliative Care Patients in a Home or Hospice Setting [ J ]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2015, 50 (1): 118-123.
  • 8ZhanZhan Li, LiZhang Chen. Comparison of ultrasound-guided modified Seldinger technique versus blind puncture for peripher-ally inserted central catheter: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Crit Care, 2015, 19 (1) : 64.
  • 9Pittiruti M, Malerba M, Carriero C, Tazza L, Gui D. Which is the easiest and safest technique for central venous access? A ret- rospective survey of more than 5, 400 cases [ J]. J Vasc Ac, cess, 2000, 1 (3): 100-107.
  • 10Cotogni P, Pittiruti M, Barbero C, et al. Catheter related com- plications in cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition : a pro- spective study over 51000 catheter days [ J]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2013, 37: 375-383.

共引文献43

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部