期刊文献+

中文版简式网络疑病量表测评大学生群体的信度与效度 被引量:9

Revision of the Chinese Version of Short-Form of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:修订简式网络疑病量表并在中国大学生群体中检验其信效度。方法:采用简式网络疑病量表、短版健康焦虑问卷、简版无法忍受不确定性量表及短式抑郁-焦虑-压力量表对大学生进行施测,其中,样本1进行通俗度检验(n1=52),样本2进行项目分析与探索性因子分析(n2=408),样本3进行验证性因素分析(n3=411),样本4进行重测信度分析(n4=75)。结果:①验证性因素分析发现,中文版简式网络疑病量表的四因素模型拟合良好(χ^2/df=2.86, GFI=0.95, CFI=0.97, TLI=0.96, IFI=0.97, RMSEA=0.07);②中文版简式网络疑病量表与短版健康焦虑问卷、简版无法忍受不确定性量表及短式抑郁-焦虑-压力量表得分均呈正相关(r=0.27~0.51, P<0.01),其组合信度在0.83~0.96之间,平均方差抽取量在0.63~0.70之间;③信度检验发现,中文版简式网络疑病量表的Cronbach’sα系数在0.83~0.92之间;分半信度在0.76~0.79之间;重测信度在0.73~0.85(P<0.01)之间。结论:中文版简式网络疑病量表在中国大学生群体中具有良好的信效度,可以作为科学的研究工具使用。 Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Short-Form of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale(CCSS-12). Methods: We surveyed college students with The Short Health Anxiety Inventory(SHAI), Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale(IUS-12) and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21(DAS-21). Totally 52 college students(sample1) were asked to evaluate the popularity degree of the scale. And totally 408 college students(sample 2) were recruited to complete the test version for item and exploratory factor analysis. And totally 411 colleges students(sample 3) were recruited to complete the test version for confirmatory factor analysis. Another totally 75 colleges students(sample 4) were tested with re-test reliability. Results: ①The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the four-factor model fit the data well(χ^2/df=2.86, GFI=0.95, CFI=0.97, TLI=0.96, IFI=0.97, RMSEA=0.07). ②The CCSS-12 correlated with SHAI, IUS-12 and DAS-21 positively(r=0.27~0.51, P<0.01). In addition, the composite reliability coefficients ranged from 0.83 to 0.96 and AVE coefficients ranged from 0.63 to 0.70 of the CCSS-12. ③The CCSS-12 has good internal reliability with Cronbach’s α coefficients ranged from 0.83 to 0.92, re-test reliability coefficients ranged from 0.73 to 0.85(P<0.01) and split-half reliability coefficients ranged from 0.76 to 0.79. Conclusion: The Chinese version of Short-Form of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale(CCSS-12) has acceptable reliability and validity and can be used to measure cyberchondria for Chinese college students.
作者 金童林 乌云特娜 杨雪 杨宏 贾彦茹 JIN Tong-lin;WU Yun-tena;YANG Xue;YANG Hong;JIA Yan-ru(College of Psychology,Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot 010022,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第2期321-325,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(BMA170035) 内蒙古自治区研究生教育创新计划项目(B20191159R) 内蒙古师范大学研究生科研创新基金项目(CXJJB19004)。
关键词 大学生 网络疑病 信度 效度 College Students Cyberchondria Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献61

  • 1高文斌,陈祉妍.网络成瘾病理心理机制及综合心理干预研究[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(4):596-603. 被引量:256
  • 2Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression an- xiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation, 1995. 112-115.
  • 3Crawford JR, Henry JD. The depression anxiety stress scales (DASS): Normative data and latent structure in a large non- clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2003, 42:111-131.
  • 4Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, et al. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 1998, 10: 176- 181.
  • 5Taouk M, Lovibond PF, Laube R. Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the 21-item depression anxiety stress scales (DASS21). In Report for New South Wales Transcuhural Mental Health Centre. 2001, Cumberland Hospital: Sydney.
  • 6吴明隆.结构方程模型-AMOS的操作与应用.重庆:重庆大学.2009.309-323.
  • 7Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inentories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1995, 33:335-343.
  • 8Henry JD, Crawford JR. The 21-item version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): Normative data and psychometric evaluation in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2005, 44:227-239.
  • 9Kimberly RZ. Psychometric properties of internet admin- istered versions of Penn state worry questionnaire (PSWQ) and depression, anxiety, and stress scale (DASS). Computers in Human Behavior, 2009, (25): 841-843.
  • 10Taylor R, et al. The utility of somatic items in the assessment of depression in chronic pain patients: A comparison of the Zung self-rating depression scale (SDS) and the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) in chronic pain and clinical and community samples. Clinical Journal of Pain, 2005, 21:91-100.

共引文献406

同被引文献53

引证文献9

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部