期刊文献+

我国教育元评估指标体系构建 被引量:8

On the Construction of Education Meta-evaluation Indicator Systems in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教育元评估是推进教育评估专业化发展的重要路径,对于实践层面教育评估活动的元评估而言,其核心要素是制订教育元评估指标。文章指出教育元评估指标的制订应遵循合目的性、科学性和可行性原则,借助理论推演、因素分解和Delphi法等方法,按照规范的流程在教育评估领域专家的指导下进行。文章还借鉴了美国教育评估标准的逻辑架构,并结合我国教育评估实践的经验,提出一套适合我国国情的教育元评估指标体系,相关的实践探索将为教育元评估的实践提供依据,也为建立我国教育评估行业规范和专业标准提供参考和借鉴。 Education meta-evaluation is an important way to promote the professionalization of education evaluation. For the meta-evaluation of practice-level educational evaluation, the core mission is to formulate education meta-evaluation indicators. The formulation should follow the principles of purposiveness, scientificity and feasibility. Only with the help of theoretical deduction, factor decomposition and Delphi method, and in accordance with the standard process, can it be effectively implemented under the guidance of relevant experts. Based on the logical framework of American education evaluation standard and the experience of China’s education evaluation practice, this paper develops a education meta-evaluation indicators system for China’s education conditions. The practical exploration will provide a basis for the practice of the education meta-evaluation, and a reference for China’s education evaluation professional standards.
作者 严芳 汪建华 Yan Fang;Wang Jianhua(Evaluation Institute of Basic Education;Institute of Comprehensive Affairs of Education,Shanghai Education Evaluation Institute,Shanghai 200031)
出处 《上海教育评估研究》 2020年第2期75-80,共6页 Shanghai Journal of Educational Evaluation
关键词 教育评估 教育元评估 评估指标 教育评估标准 Education evaluation Education meta-evaluation Meta-evaluation indicators Education evaluation standards
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献6

  • 1[美]斯塔费尔比姆,等.评估模型[M].苏锦丽,等,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2007:5-21.
  • 2Madaus, G. F., Scriven, M. S. & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983) Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation[ M ]. Boston : Kluwer - Nijhoff.
  • 3Fitzpartrick, J. L. , Sanders, J. R. ,& Worthen,B. R. (2004) Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (3rd ed. ) [ M ]. Boston/Allyn and Bacon : Pearson Ed- ucation.
  • 4苏锦丽.展望我国教育评鉴专业之发展[C].台湾师范大学教育研究中心举办“教育评鉴回顾与展望”学术研讨会论文集,2004.24-27.
  • 5Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (2001) Operating Procedures for the development and approval of standards of the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation[ EB/OL]. From http ://www. wmich, edu/evalctr/jc/ Governance/Operproc. pdf.
  • 6American Evaluation Association (2004) Guiding Prin- ciples for Evaluators [ EB/OL]. From http ://www. eval. org/Pub- lications/GuidingPrinciplesPrintable, asp.

共引文献14

同被引文献90

引证文献8

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部