摘要
日本在知识产权专门审判机构的建设上有多年经验,东京知识产权高等法院的设立,及其机构沿革、案件管辖、技术调查官制度与"二审合一"的审判模式,均对我国知识产权法院建设具有借鉴意义。结合日本东京知识产权高等法院的建设经验与我国的知识产权审判实践,我国应尽快完善专利权效力认定机制,并参考日本的技术调查官制度与专家委员制度,健全技术事实查明机制。同时,在审判机构、程序制度等条件不成熟的情况下,应继续将"二审合一"模式的完善作为改革重点。
Japan has many years of experience in the construction of specialized intellectual property judicial organs, the establishment of the Tokyo Intellectual Property High Court, as well as its institutional evolution, case jurisdiction, system of technical investigators and the trial mode of "two traditional procedures have consolidated to one system", all of these have reference significance for the construction of intellectual property courts in China. Based on the construction experience of the Tokyo Intellectual Property High Court in Japan and the trial practice of intellectual property in China, our country should perfect the patent validity cognizance mechanism as soon as possible, and refer to Japan’s system of technical investigator and expert committee, perfect the technical fact-finding mechanism. At the same time, in the case of immature conditions such as the judicial organs and procedural systems, we should continue to improve the "two-in-one" trail model as the focus of reform.
作者
沈昊
SHEN Hao(School of Intellectual Property,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073)
出处
《中国发明与专利》
2020年第4期80-86,共7页
China Invention & Patent
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“中国知识产权法院建设研究”(项目编号:17JJD820014)的阶段性成果。
关键词
知识产权高等法院
知识产权上诉法院
技术事实查明机制
Intellectual Property High Court
Intellectual Property Appeals Court
technical fact-finding mechanism