期刊文献+

内涵式发展及其学生评价多元化体系构建——基于中国古代文学课程改革视角 被引量:2

Connotative development and the construction of student evaluation diversification system--Based on the perspective of curriculum reform of ancient Chinese literature
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人才质量标准的科学构建,是顺利达成人才培养目标的核心要素,注重学生内涵式发展需要启动学生评价智能系统,其中关键点是进行评价体系的多维创新。作为传统课程的中国古代文学,其改革需要在学生评价机制上进行有效的理论建构和教学实践,确立科学评价理念,将教育内在价值与外在价值统一,扩大多元评价的实施空间,提高人才培养的适切性,应当是该课程改革努力的方向。 The scientific construction of talent quality standards is the core element for successfully achieving the goal of talent training. Focusing on the development of students’ connotation needs to start the student evaluation intelligent system. The key point is to carry out multi-dimensional innovation of the evaluation system. As a traditional course of Chinese ancient literature, its reform needs to carry out effective theoretical construction and teaching practice on the student evaluation mechanism, establish a scientific evaluation concept,unify the intrinsic value of education and external value, expand the implementation space of multi-evaluation,and improve personnel training. The relevance should be the direction of the curriculum reform efforts.
作者 支媛 Zhi Yuan(College of Literature,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550001,China;Liupanshui Normal University,Liupanshui 553001,China)
出处 《六盘水师范学院学报》 2020年第2期102-106,共5页 Journal of Liupanshui Normal University
基金 2018年度六盘水师范学院教学内容和课程体系改革立项项目“中国古代文学课程学生评价体系改革与实践”(LPSSYjg201819) 2017年度贵州省教育厅本科教学内容和课程体系改革项目“应用型人才培养背景下非汉语言文学专业中国古代文学课程的教学改革与实践”(2017520094)阶段性成果。
关键词 学生评价 质量标准 内涵式发展 中国古代文学 student evaluation quality standards connotative development ancient Chinese literature
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献13

  • 1张新科.文学视角中的“鸿都门学”——兼论汉末文风的转变[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,34(1):103-108. 被引量:9
  • 2Gipps, C. Assessment for learning [C] // Little, A., & A. Wolf (eds.). Assessment in Transition: learning, monitoring and selection in international perspective. Pergamon Press,1996: 254.
  • 3Olmedilla, Juan M. Tradition and change in national examination systems: A comparison of Mediterranean and Anglo- Saxon countries[C]//Ecksteino, M.A., & Noah, H. J. Exami-nations: Comparative and International Studies. Pergamon Press, 1992: 142.
  • 4Berlak, H. The need for a new science of assessment[C]// Berlak, H.,et al. Toward a New Science of Educational Testing and Assessment. State University of New York Press, 1992:12.
  • 5Stiggins, R. New Assessment Beliefs for New School Mission[J], Phi Dalta Kappan, 2004(9): 22-27.
  • 6Stiggins, R. New Assessment Beliefs for New School Mission [J]. Phi Dalta Kappan, 2004(9): 22-27.
  • 7Atkin, J.M., Black, P., & room assessment and the Coffey, J. E. ( Eds ) ( 2001 ). Class- National Science Education Standards[M]. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press. Chappuis, J. Helping Studengt Understand Assessment[J] Educational Leadership, 2005, 63 ( 3 ) : 39-43.
  • 8Stiggins, R. From Formative Assessment to Assessment for Learning: A Path to Success in Standards-based School[J]. Phi Delta Kappan, 2005( 10): 324-328.
  • 9.樊川文集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1978..
  • 10皮锡瑞.经学历史[M].北京:中华书局,2004..

共引文献144

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部