期刊文献+

基于区间值直觉模糊集的技术创新风险评价方法 被引量:6

Technology innovation risk evaluation based on interval value intuitionistic fuzzy sets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 降低企业技术创新风险是提高企业技术创新绩效的关键.首先以技术创新六阶段模型为基础,针对技术创新的全生命周期识别了18项潜在风险.之后基于区间值直觉模糊集构建了应用于企业技术创新风险评价的模糊失效模式与影响分析(failure mode and effect analysis,FMEA)方法.该方法利用区间值直觉模糊集来评价技术创新各潜在风险的严重度、发生度和检测度,通过基于逼近理想解排序法(technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution,TOPSIS)的非线性规划模型获得风险优先级并进行排序,以此为依据确定潜在风险的优先处理次序.最后以D公司的座椅开发项目为例,验证了该模糊FMEA方法的可行性. Reducing the risks of technological innovation in enterprises is the key to improving the technological innovation performance.This paper first identifies 18 potential risks based on the six-stage model of technological innovation,and then constructs the fuzzy failure mode and effect analysis(FMEA) method applied to the risk assessment of technological innovation based on the interval value intuitionistic fuzzy set.The method evaluates the severity,occurrence and detection of each potential risk by the interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy set.Risk priority numbers are obtained and sorted by the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS)-based nonlinear programming solution,which can be used as a basis for prioritizing potential risks.At last,the feasibility of the fuzzy FMEA method is verified by an example of D-company’s seat development project.
作者 田永超 于丽英 TIAN Yongchao;YU Liying(School of Management,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China)
出处 《上海大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第2期292-300,共9页 Journal of Shanghai University:Natural Science Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(11671250)。
关键词 技术创新 区间值直觉模糊集 失效模式与影响分析 风险评价 technological innovation interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy set failure mode and effect analysis(FMEA) risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献36

  • 1商建初,范方志,张耿庆.技术创新、经济增长与政府干预——基于中国的实证研究[J].统计与决策,2005,21(01X):37-39. 被引量:10
  • 2徐泽水,陈剑.一种基于区间直觉判断矩阵的群决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(4):126-133. 被引量:140
  • 3ARCHIBUGI D,MICHIE J.Technology and Innovation:An Introduction[J].Cambridge Journal of Economics,1995(19):1-4.
  • 4WANG T.Comparison of Methods for Valuating Technology Innovation and Adoption Project[D].George Washington University,USA,2007.
  • 5HELLSTROM T.Systemic Innovation and Risk:Technology Assessment and the Challenge of Responsible Innovation[J].Technology in Society,2003,25(3):369-384.
  • 6CHEN L K,TAO Z.The Impact of Public Policies on Innovation and Imitation:The Role of R&D Technology in Growth Models[J].International Economic Review,1999,40 (1):187-207.
  • 7CARLSSON B.Internationalization of Innovation Systems:A Survey of the Literature[J].Research Policy,2006,35(1):56-67.
  • 8ROPER S,HEWITT-DUNDAS N.Innovation Persistence:Survey and Case-study Evidence[J].Research Policy,2008,37(1):149-162.
  • 9包国宪,任世科.基于三层次双维度评价体系的产学研结合技术创新风险实证研究.
  • 10Hung W L,Wu J W.Correlation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets by centroid method[J].Information Sciences,2002,144(1-4):219-225.

共引文献322

同被引文献71

引证文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部