期刊文献+

微创手术治疗肝胆管结石患者的临床疗效

Clinical Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Hepatolithiasis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察微创手术治疗肝胆管结石患者临床疗效。方法本次研究挑选的66例肝胆管结石患者均为我院2018年1月至2019年7月所收治,按照患者入院顺序单双分成2组,每组各33例,对照组患者手术方式为传统开腹手术,研究组为微创手术治疗,对比两组临床疗效。结果在手术时间上比较研究组长与对照组,数据比较P<0.05具有统计学意义;在术中出血量、下床活动时间、胃肠道蠕动恢复时间、住院时间上比较研究组明显优于对照组患者,数据比较P<0.05具有统计学意义。研究组患者残石率、并发症率、复发率均为3.03%,对照组患者残石率、并发症率、复发率分别为15.15%、27.27%、18.18%,数据比较P<0.05具有统计学意义。结论微创手术治疗肝胆管结石患者不仅临床疗效高,复发率、并发症发生率以及残石率均较低,临床疗效显著,值得临床推广使用。 Objective To observe the clinical effect of minimally invasive surgery for hepatolithiasis.Methods 66 patients with hepatolithiasis selected in this study were treated in our hospital from January 2018 to July 2019.According to the order of admission,they were divided into two groups,33 cases in each group.The operation mode of the control group was traditional laparotomy,while that of the study group was minimally invasive surgery.The clinical effects of the two groups were compared.Result Compared with the control group in operation time,the data of the study group were significantly better than those of the control group in bleeding volume,time of getting out of bed,recovery time of gastrointestinal peristalsis and hospital stay,and the data were significantly better than those of the control group(P<0.05).The residual stone rate,complication rate and recurrence rate of the study group were all 3.03%.The residual stone rate,complication rate and recurrence rate of the control group were 15.15%,27.27%and 18.18%,respectively.The data were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Minimally invasive surgery for hepatolithiasis has not only high clinical efficacy,but also low recurrence rate,complication rate and residual stone rate,it is worthy of clinical application.
作者 杨斌 刘洋 YANG Bin;LIU Yang(Guangji Hospital of Yueyang,Yueyang 414000,China)
出处 《中国医药指南》 2020年第12期119-120,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
关键词 微创手术 肝胆管结石 疗效 Minimally invasive surgery Hepatolithiasis Efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献83

  • 1Chia-Cheng Lin,Ping-Yi Lin,Yao-Li Chen.Comparison of concomitant and subsequent cholangiocarcinomas associated with hepatolithiasis:Clinical implications[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(3):375-380. 被引量:16
  • 2邓予,罗云藩,黄华容.纤维胆道镜在肝胆管结石治疗中的应用价值[J].国际医药卫生导报,2005,11(16):27-28. 被引量:1
  • 3黄志强,石景森,王炳煌.胆道外科基础与临床[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.723.
  • 4Paganini AM, Guerrieri M. Sarnari J, et al. Long-term results af- ter laparoscopic transverse choledochotomy for common bile duct stones [J].Surg Endosc, 2005,19 ( 5 ) : 705- 709. DOI : 10.1007/ s00464 - 004 - 8944 - 4.
  • 5Berthou JCh, Dron B, Charbonneau Ph, et al. Evaluation of lapa- roscopic treatment of common bile duct stones in a prospective se- ries of 505 patients : indications and results [ J ]. Surg Endose, 2007,21 ( i 1 ) : 1970-1974. DOI : 10. 1007/s00464-007-9387-5.
  • 6Liu JG, Wang YJ, Shu GM, et al. Laparoscopic versus endoscopic management of choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing laparo- scopic cholecystectomy : a recta-analysis [ J ]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ,2014,24 (5) :287- 294. DO1:10.1089/lap. 2013. 0546.
  • 7Sahoo MR, Kumar AT, Patnaik A. Randomised study on single stage laparo-endoseopie rendezvous ( intra-operative ERCP) proce- dure versus two stage approach ( pre-operative ERCP followed by laparoseopic cholecysteetomy) for the management of cholelithiasis with eholedoeholithiasis[J]. J Minim Access Surg,2014,10 ( 3 ) : 139-143. DOI : 10. 4103/0972-9941. 134877.
  • 8Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, et al. Prospective Randomized Tri- al of LC + LCBDE vs ERCP/S + LC for Common Bile Duct Stone Disease[ J ]. Arch Surg, 2010,145 ( 1 ) : 28-33. DOI: 10. 1001/ archsurg. 2009. 226.
  • 9Kenny R, Richardson J, McGlone ER, et al. Laparoscopic com- mon bile duct exploration versus pre or post - operative ERCP for common bile duct stones in patients undergoing cholecystectomy: is there any difference? [J]. Int J Surg,2014,12(9) :989-993. DOI : 10. 1016/j. ijsu. 2014.06. 013.
  • 10Yin Z, Xu K, Sun J, et al. Is the end of the T-Tube Drainage Era in Laparoscopic Choledochotomy for Common Bile Duct Stones Is Coming? A systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [ J]. Ann Surg, 2013,257 ( 1 ) :54-66. DOI:10. 1097/SLA. 0b013e3-18268314b.

共引文献135

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部