期刊文献+

外路泪囊鼻腔吻合术在基层医院应用推广价值 被引量:3

Application value of external DCR in primary hospitals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析传统的外路泪囊鼻腔吻合术(外路DCR)治疗慢性泪囊炎在基层医院的应用优势。方法在分析十多年临床病例的基础上采用回顾性分析治疗效果、成本核算、效果跟踪、适用范围等,进行外路DCR和经鼻DCR样本的比对,找出二者在医疗重要指标上的异同。结果两种手术在治疗效果、适用范围上差异有统计学意义,在成本核算、适用范围上差异较大。结论传统的外路DCR是治疗慢性泪囊炎的金标准,比经鼻DCR的手术成功率更高,适用范围更广,更具备成本优势,是治疗慢性泪囊炎的主要方式,在基层医院更是具备长期应用和推广价值。 Objective To analyze the advantages of traditional DCR in the treatment of chronic dacryocystitis in primary hospitals.Methods Based on the analysis results of more than 10 years of clinical cases,retrospective analysis was performed on treatment efficacy,cost effectiveness,effect tracking,application scope,and so on.Comparison of external DCR and transnasal DCR was conducted to find out the similarities and differences in important medical indicators.Results There were statistically significant differences in therapeutic effect and application scope between the two types of surgery,and significant differences in cost effectiveness and application scope were observed.Conclusions Traditional external DCR is the gold standard for the treatment of chronic dacryocystitis,which has higher success rate,wider application range and more cost effective than transnasal DCR.External DCR is the main method for the treatment of chronic dacryocystitis,and has long-term application and promotion value in primary hospitals.
作者 汪传梅 Wang Chuanmei(Department of Ophthalmology, the People's Hospital of Huangshan,Anhui 245000,China)
出处 《临床眼科杂志》 2020年第2期174-176,共3页 Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology
关键词 外路泪囊鼻腔吻合术 基层医院 慢性泪囊炎 External dacryocystorhinostomy Primary hospital Chronic dacryocystitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献16

  • 1吕红彬,张勤修,罗清礼.经鼻内镜下鼻腔泪囊吻合术与传统泪囊鼻腔吻合术的比较[J].中国内镜杂志,2006,12(3):225-227. 被引量:43
  • 2Savino G, Battendieri R, Traina S, et al. External vs. endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: has the current view changed? [J]. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ita1,2014 ,34 :29-35.
  • 3Karim R, Ghabrial R, Lynch T, et al. A comparison of extemal and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction[J]. Clin Ophthalmol,2011,5 :979- 989.
  • 4Erds1 H, Akyol N, Imamoglu HI, et al. Long-term follow-up of external dacryocystorhinostomy and the factors affecting its success [ J]. Orbit,2005,24:99-102.
  • 5Hartikainen J, Grenman R, Puukka P, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy [ J ]. Ophthalmology, 1998, 105:1106-1113.
  • 6Dolman PJ. Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with nonlaser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy [ J ]. Ophthalmology, 2003,110:78-84.
  • 7Ben Simon GJ, Joseph J, Lee S, et al. External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center [ J ]. Ophthalmology, 2005,112 : 1463- 1468.
  • 8Zaidi FH, Symanski S, Olver JM. A clinical trial of endoscopic vs external dacryocystorhinostomy for partial nasolacrimal duet obstruction[J]. Eye,2011,25:1219-1224.
  • 9Mathew MR, McGuiness R, Webb LA, et al. Patient satisfaction in our initial experience with endonasal endoscopic non-laser dacryocystorhinostomy [ J ]. Orbit,2004,23:77-85.
  • 10Hii BW, McNab AA, Friebel JD. A comparison of external and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in regard to patient satisfaction and cost[ J]. Orbit,2012,31:67-76.

共引文献28

同被引文献38

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部