期刊文献+

辱虐管理的应对:基于人际拒绝的多动力模型分析 被引量:2

Coping strategies for abusive supervision: An interpersonal rejection-based multi-dynamic model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着辱虐管理产生破坏性影响的作用机制不断得到丰富和完善,受辱虐下属选择特定应对方式的原因以及有效性成为未来辱虐管理的研究方向。基于人际拒绝的多动力模型,梳理了在不同质量LMX的关系情境中受辱虐下属的应对方式,并提出特定应对方式可能引起辱虐管理的恶性循环的假设模型。建议未来研究通过丰富下属的应对行为变量、增加人格和环境的调节机制以完善受辱虐下属的应对模型,并以此为基础探究辱虐管理的消极互动机制,为打破辱虐管理恶性循环提供理论支持。 As the literature on abusive supervision has gained a great understanding of its detrimental effects and the underlying mechanisms, how subordinates cope with the experience of abusive supervision and the effectiveness of different coping strategies are promising new directions for future research. In this article, based on the multi-dynamic model of interpersonal rejection, we discussed how subordinates might cope with the experience of abusive supervision differently at low and high levels of LMX, and proposed a model in which certain coping strategies can lead to the subsequent experience of increased abusive supervision. We suggest future research strengthen our understanding of subordinates’ coping strategies for abusive supervision with a focus on exploring new coping strategies, including individual different variables, and examining situational factors as moderators. Further, future research can investigate the negative interactions between leaders and subordinates, and provide theoretical support for breaking the cycle of abusive supervision.
作者 严瑜 赵颖 YAN Yu;ZHAO Ying(Department of Psychology,School of Philosophy,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第5期844-854,共11页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家社科基金项目“基于情绪角色模型的组织中不文明行为的螺旋效应研究”(18BGL119)资助。
关键词 辱虐管理 应对方式 多动力模型 领导-部署交换 abusive supervision coping strategies multi-dynamic model leader-member exchange
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献92

  • 1Aquino, K., & Bradfield, M. (2000). Perceived victimizationin the workplace: The role of situational factors and victim characteristics. Organization Science, 11(5), 525-537.
  • 2Aquino, K., & Bommer, W. H. (2003). Preferential mistreatment: How victim status moderates the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and workplace victimization. Organization Science, 14(4), 374-385.
  • 3Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191-201.
  • 4Aryee, S., Sun, L. Y., Chan, Z. X. G., & Debrah, Y. A. (2008) Abusive supervision and contextual performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Management and Organization Review, 4(3), 393-411.
  • 5Ashforth, B. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47(7), 755-778.
  • 6Bamberger, E A., & Bacharach, S. B. (2006). Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations, 59(6), 723-752.
  • 7Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Handbook of work stress. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • 8Breaux, D. M., Perrew6, P. L., Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). Time to try a little tenderness7 The detrimental effects of accountability when coupled with abusive supervision. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(2), 111-122.
  • 9Burton, J. P., & Hoobler, J. M. (2011). Aggressive reactions to abusive supervision: The role of interactional justice and narcissism. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52(4), 389-398.
  • 10Carlson, D. S., Ferguson, M., Perrew6, P. L., & Whitten, D. (2011). The fallout from abusive supervision: An examination of subordinates and their partners. Personnel Psychology, 64(4), 937-961.

共引文献121

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部