期刊文献+

PPH联合肛瘘切除术治疗混合痔伴低位肛瘘的临床效果分析 被引量:5

PPH Combined with Anal Fistula Resection in the Treatment of Mixed Hemorrhoids Complicated with Low Anal Fistula:Clinical Effect Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 为探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)联合肛瘘切除术治疗混合痔伴低位肛瘘的临床疗效,选择2018年3月至2019年3月我院收治的100例混合痔伴低位肛瘘患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组,各50例,观察组予PPH联合肛瘘切除术治疗,对照组予混合痔外剥内扎术联合肛瘘切除术治疗,比较2组治疗效果,术后疼痛、水肿、出血程度,以及创面愈合时间。结果显示,2组患者均治愈。观察组术后疼痛、水肿、出血程度评分均明显低于对照组,P<0.05;而且观察组创面愈合时间明显短于对照组,P<0.05。结果表明,与混合痔外剥内扎术联合肛瘘切除术相比,PPH联合肛瘘切除术治疗混合痔伴低位肛瘘患者术后疼痛、水肿、出血程度更轻,创面愈合更快。 To investigate the clinical effect of PPH combined with anal fistula resection(AFR)in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids(MH)complicated with low anal fistula(LAF),enrolled 100 patients with MH plus LAF treated in author’s hospital from March 2018 to March 2019,and randomly divided them into observation group(n=50,treated with PPH combined with AFR)and control group(n=50,treated with external dissection&internal ligation combined with AFR),then the treatment effect,postoperative pain,edema,bleeding degree and wound healing time were compared between the two groups.As results,both groups were cured.In the scores of postoperative pain,edema and bleeding degree observation group was significantly lower than control group(P<0.05),and in the wound healing time observation group was significantly shorter than control group(P<0.05).Results show that compared with MH external dissection&internal ligation combined with AFR,PPH combined with AFR is used to treat patients with less postoperative pain,edema,bleeding,and faster wound healing.
作者 贺燕芳 朱云强 HE Yan-fang;ZHU Yun-qiang(Dept,of Colo proctology,the First TCM Hospital of Luoyang City,Luoyang,Henan 471000)
出处 《中国肛肠病杂志》 2020年第2期18-19,共2页 Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词 混合痔 低位肛瘘 吻合器痔上黏膜环切术 肛瘘切除术 效果 Mixed hemorrhoid Low anal fistula PPH Anal fistula resection Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献33

  • 1《痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术(PPH)暂行规范》修订[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2005,8(4):342-342. 被引量:236
  • 2吴青眉.肛瘘切除缝合与切开换药的疗效对照[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2005,11(5):385-386. 被引量:5
  • 3金淳民,毛洁松,范春生.PPH合并手术的临床探讨[J].结直肠肛门外科,2006,12(2):95-96. 被引量:10
  • 4痔临床诊治指南(2006版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463. 被引量:2100
  • 5中华医学会外科学分会肛肠外科学组.痔诊治暂行标准[J].中华外科杂志,2003,41:699-699.
  • 6Ganio E, Altomare DF, Milito G, et al. Long-term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trim o{ stap.ed haemor- rhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.Br J Surg,2007,94(8) 1033-1037.
  • 7Candela G,Varriale S,Di Libero I.,et al.The gold standard in the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease. Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy vs Longo mucoprolapsectomy: compa- ring techniques.Minerva Chir,2007,62(3) : 151-159.
  • 8Czarzasty W, Kruszewski W J, Zielifiski J, et al. A one-year follow-up of the quality of life after stapled hemorrhoidope- xy.Pol Przegl Chit,2011,83(4):204-211.
  • 9Kim JS, Vashist YK, Thieltges S, et al.Stapled hemorrhoid- opexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in cir cumferential third-degree hemorrhoids:long term results of Gastrointest Surg, 2013,17.
  • 10Ammaturo CiTufano A, Spiniello E, et al.Stapled haemor- rhoidopexy vs. Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy for grade III haemorrhoids: a randomized clinical trial.G Chir, 2012,33(10) :346-351.

共引文献51

同被引文献54

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部