期刊文献+

LKB1基因在急性淋巴细胞白血病患者中的表达水平与病情的相关性 被引量:1

Expression Level of LKB1 Gene in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Its Correlation with Illness Condition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者体内LKB1基因的表达水平,分析患者病情与LKB1基因表达水平的相关性。方法:选择本院住院治疗的白血病患者98例,根据诊断结果的不同分为:ALL组56例,ANLL组42例。选取同时期50例健康体检者作为对照组。3组患者的静脉血分离单个核细胞,应用RT-PCR检测并比较各组的LKB1基因表达水平。根据ALL患者LKB1基因表达水平分为2个亚组:低表达组(39例),高表达组(17例)。随访3年,应用Kaplan-Meier法绘制2组ALL患者的OS及DFS曲线。比较2组CR及复发比例的差异。应用多因素Logistic回归分析影响ALL患者生存相关的危险因素。结果:LKB1基因表达水平对照组为1.56(1.38-1.74)>ALL组1.32(1.22-1.40)>ANLL组0.89(0.78-1.02),3组比较具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。与低表达组比较,高表达组CR率显著较高,而复发比例较低(均P<0.05)。随访3年,LKB1高表达的ALL患者OS和DFS率均优于LKB1低表达的ALL患者(P<0.05)。LKB1基因表达水平与ALL患者危险分层存在负相关(r=-0.712,P=0.039),其中标危ALL,LKB1基因低表达组患者显著少于高表达组(P=0.014),而高危ALL,LKB1基因低表达组患者显著高于高表达组(P=0.002)。多元Logistic回归分析显示,年龄(OR=2.872,P=0.020)、外周血幼稚细胞数(OR=2.268,P=0.028)为ALL患者生存相关的危险因素,而LKB1表达水平(OR=0.426,P=0.016)为保护因素。结论:ALL患者体内LKB1基因呈低表达水平,且表达水平越低ALL病情越严重,预后越差。 Objective:To evaluate the expression level of LKB1 gene in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL),and analyze its correlation with illness condition of patients.Methods:The 98 patients with leukemia in our hospital were divided into two groups according to the diagnosis of patients:ALL group(56 cases)and ANLL group(42 cases).The 50 healthy persons subjected to physical examination were selected as control group.The peripheral blood mononuclear cells(PBMNC)were separated from the venous blood samples of three groups,and the expression levels of LKB1 gene were detected by RT-PCR and were compared among three groups.Patients in ALL group were divided into two groups according to the expression level of LKB1 gene:low expression group(39 cases)and high expression group(17 cases).Follow-up 3 years,the curves of OS and DFS in two groups were gained by Kaplan-Meier analysis.The ratios of CR and recurrence were compared between two groups.The related risk factors(all P<0.05)influencing the survival of patients with ALL were confirmed by multivariate logistic analysis.Results:The expression level of LKB1 gene of control group was 1.56(1.38-1.74)>ALL group 1.32(1.22-1.40)>ANLL group 0.89(0.78-1.02).There were statistical differences among the three groups(all P<0.05).Compared with low expression group,the CR rate in high expression group were higher,but the recurrence rate were lower in high expression group(all P<0.05).Follow-up 3 years,the OS and DFS rates in high expression group were higher than those in lowexpression group(all P<0.05).There was negative relation between expression level of LKB1 gene and clinical risk level of ALL patients(r=-0.712,P=0.039).For standard risk ALL,the patients in LKB1 low expression group was significantey lower than that in high expression group;and for high risk ALL,the patients in LKB1 low expression group was significant higher than that in high expression group.Multivariate logistic analysis showed that the age(OR=2.872,P=0.020),peripheral blood immature cell count(OR=2.268,P=0.028)were independent risk factors for survival of patients with ALL,and the expression level of LKB1 gene(OR=0.426,P=0.016)is protective factor.Conclusion:The expression level of LKB1 gene in patients with ALL is low,moreover the more low expression level of LKB1 gene were,the more severe ill condition and more poor prognosis were.
作者 韩锋 赖庭文 李浩 谭文敏 吴洁 HAN Feng;LAI Ting-Wen;LI-Hao;TAN Wen-Min;WU Jie(Department of Clinical Laboratorial Examination,The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College,Haikou 570102,Hainan Province,China;Department of Hematology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University,Haikou 570100,Hainan Province,China;Clinical Hematology Laboratory of Tropical Medicine and Laboratory Medical College of Hainan Medical College,Haikou 570102,Hainan Province,China)
出处 《中国实验血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第2期464-469,共6页 Journal of Experimental Hematology
关键词 急性淋巴细胞白血病 LKB1基因 病情 Kaplan-Meier生存分析 acute lymphoblastic leukemia LKB1 gene ill condition Kaplan-Meier survival anaylsis
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献35

  • 1Haferlach T, Kern W, Sclmittger S, et al. Modern diagnostics in acute leukemias [ J ]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2005, 56 (2) :223- 234. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.04.008.
  • 2Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia [J]. Blood, 2016, 127 (20):2391-2405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03 -643544.
  • 3NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology--Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (2016 Version I) [DB/OL]. http:// www.nccn.org.
  • 4Haferlach T, Bacher U, Kern W, et al. Diagnostic pathways in acute leukemias: a proposal for a multimodal approach [J]. Ann Hematol, 2007, 86(5):311-327. doi: 10.1007/s00277-007-0253- 2.
  • 5Bene MC, Castoldi G, Knapp W, et al. Proposals for the immunological classification of acute leukemias. European Group for the Immunological Characterization of Leukemias (EGIL) [J]. Leukemia, 1995, 9( 10):1783-1786.
  • 6Bene MC, Bemier M, Casasnovas RO, et al. The reliability and specificity of c-kit for the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemias and undifferentiated leukemias. The European Group for the Immunological Classification of Leukemias (EGIL) [ J ]. Blood, 1998, 92(2):596-599.
  • 7G6kbuget N, Hoelzer D. Treatment of adult acute lymphoblasticleukemia[Jl. Semin Hematol, 2009, 46( 1 ):64-75. doi: 10.1053/ j .seminhematol.2008.09.003.
  • 8Hummel M, Bentink S, Berger H, et al. A biologic definition of Burkitt's lymphoma from transcriptional and genomic profiling [J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 354 (23):2419-2430. doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa055351.
  • 9Thomas DA, Faderl S, O'Brien S, et al. Chemoimmunotherapy with hyper-CVAD plus rituximab for the treatment of adult Burkitt and Burkitt-type lymphoma or acute lymphoblastic leukemia [J]. Cancer, 2006, 106 (7):1569-1580. doi: 10.1002/ cncr.21776.
  • 10Rowe JM. Optimal management of adults with ALL [J]. Br J Haematol, 2009, 144 (4):468- 483. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2141. 2008.07513 .x.

共引文献176

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部