期刊文献+

复发难治急性髓系白血病异基因造血干细胞移植疗效及预后因素分析 被引量:6

Analysis of efficacy and prognostic factors of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)治疗复发难治急性髓系白血病(AML)的效果及影响预后的相关因素。方法回顾性分析2011年6月至2018年10月于郑州大学附属肿瘤医院行allo-HSCT治疗的35例复发难治AML患者临床资料。分析移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)发生率、移植后总生存(OS)率、无病生存(DFS)率、移植相关死亡率及复发率,并分析影响预后的危险因素。结果移植后所有患者均获得造血重建。100 dⅡ~Ⅳ度急性GVHD发生率为(22.9±7.7)%,3年慢性GVHD发生率为(49.5±10.6)%。移植后中位随访时间为14.1个月(4.2~89.4个月),18例生存(其中16例DFS),17例死亡;14例患者复发,中位复发时间为4.7个月(2.9~32.4个月)。移植后3年OS率、DFS率分别为(44.4±9.3)%、(43.0±9.5)%。单因素分析显示,移植前疾病未缓解、移植前不良遗传学危险度分组、移植后复发为影响OS的危险因素(均P<0.05)。移植前完全缓解组和移植前未缓解组的3年OS率分别为(63.2±12.0)%、(15.7±12.8)%(P=0.025),3年DFS率分别为(62.2±12.3)%、(15.3±12.7)%(P=0.028),3年复发率分别为(28.2±10.7)%、(80.6±15.7)%(P=0.057)。移植前遗传学高危组患者移植后3年复发率较中危组及低危组高,三组分别为100.0%、(45.0±12.1)%、(14.3±13.2)%(P=0.045)。移植后3年移植相关死亡率为(18.7±7.7)%。结论allo-HSCT是挽救性治疗复发难治AML的有效手段,复发是影响生存的主要因素,移植前降低肿瘤负荷对减少复发和提高疗效至关重要。 Objective To explore the efficacy and prognostic factors of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(allo-HSCT)in the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia(AML).Methods The clinical data of 35 patients with relapsed/refractory AML treated with allo-HSCT in the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from June 2011 to October 2018 was retrospectively analyzed.The overall survival(OS),disease-free survival(DFS),graft versus host disease(GVHD)incidence,transplantation related mortality and recurrence rate were calculated,and the risk factors affecting prognosis were analyzed.Results Hematopoietic reconstitution was obtained in all patients after transplantation.The 100 d incidence of gradeⅡ-Ⅳacute GVHD was(22.9±7.7)%,and the 3-year incidence of chronic GVHD was(49.5±10.60)%.The median follow-up time after transplantation was 14.1 months(4.2-89.4 months).In all cases,18 cases survived(including 16 cases of DFS),and 17 cases died.Fourteen cases relapsed,and the median recurrence time was 4.7 months(2.9-32.4 months).The 3-year OS rate and DFS rate were(44.4±9.3)%and(43.0±9.5)%,respectively.Univariate analysis showed that the non-remission disease before transplantation,poor genetic risk grade before transplantation and recurrence after transplantation were the risk factors for OS(all P<0.05).The 3-year OS rates in complete remission before transplantation group and non-remission before transplantation group were(63.2±12.0)%and(15.7±12.8)%(P=0.025),the 3-year DFS rates were(62.2±12.3)%and(15.3±12.7)%(P=0.028),and the 3-year recurrence rates were(28.2±10.7)%and(80.6±15.7)%(P=0.057).The 3-year recurrence rate in genetic high-risk group was higher than that in middle-risk group and low-risk group[100.0%,(45.0±12.1)%and(14.3±13.2)%,P=0.045].The 3-year tansplantation related mortality was(18.7±7.7)%.Conclusions Allo-HSCT is an effective method for salvage treatment of relapsed/refractory AML,and recurrence is the main factor affecting survival.Reducing tumor load before transplantation is very important for reducing recurrence and improving curative effect.
作者 李婷婷 符粤文 艾昊 王倩 王勇奇 焦雪丽 魏旭东 宋永平 Li Tingting;Fu Yuewen;Ai Hao;Wang Qian;Wang Yongqi;Jiao Xueli;Wei Xudong;Song Yongping(Department of Hematology,the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450008,China)
出处 《白血病.淋巴瘤》 CAS 2020年第3期146-152,共7页 Journal of Leukemia & Lymphoma
基金 河南省医学科技攻关计划重点项目(201502026)。
关键词 白血病 髓样 急性 造血干细胞移植 难治 复发 预后 Leukemia myeloid acute Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Refractory Recurrence Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献41

  • 1黄晓军.难治/复发白血病的造血干细胞移植[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(32):2240-2242. 被引量:13
  • 2钱思轩,李建勇,沈云峰,蒋元强,陆化,吴汉新,徐卫,程蕴琳,盛瑞兰.CAG预激方案治疗老年人急性髓细胞白血病的临床观察[J].中华老年医学杂志,2007,26(4):248-250. 被引量:39
  • 3Duval M, Klein JP, He W, et al. Hematopoietie stem-cell transplan- tation for acute leukemia in relapse or primary induction failure. J Clin Oncol,2010,28:3730-3738.
  • 4Nemecek ER, Gooley TA, Woolfrey AE, et al. Outcome of alloge- neic bone marrow transplantation for children with advanced acute myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2004,34:799-806.
  • 5Capizzi RL, Poole M, Cooper MR, et al. Treatment of poor risk acute leukemia with sequential high-dose ARA-C and asparagi- nase. Blood, 1984,63:694-700.
  • 6Pastore D, Specchia G, Carluccio P, et al. FLAG-IDA in the treatment of refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: single- center experience. Ann Hematol, 2003,82:231-235.
  • 7Morris ES, MacDonald KP, Hill GR. Stem cell mobilization with G-CSF analogs: a rational approach to separate GVHD and GVL?. Blood,2006, 107 : 3430-3435.
  • 8Rowe JR,Tallman MS.How I treat acute myeloid leukemia.Blood,2010;116(17):3147-3156.
  • 9Blum W,Bolwell BJ,Phillips G,et al.High disease burden isassociated with poor outcomes for patients with acute myeloidleukemia not in remission who undergo unrelated donor celltransplantation.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant,2006;12(1):61-67.
  • 10Oyekunle AA,Kroger N,Zabelina T,et al.Allogeneic stem-celltransplantation in patients with refractory acute leukemia:a long-term follow-up.Bone Marrow Transplant,2006;37(1):45-50.

共引文献598

同被引文献68

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部