失信被执行人隐私权论辩

Argument on the Right of Privacy of Dishonest Persons Subject to Enforcement

失信被执行人信息公开制度实施后,出现了失信被执行人信息被过度曝光、隐私权受到额外侵害的问题。失信被执行人隐私权受到侵害,不仅仅因制度实体规定不明,法院手中的裁量权过大,救济程序所能发挥的作用有限,更重要一点在于宪法隐私权的缺位。为消除此制度带来的负面影响,一方面需要完善此制度的实体,确立隐私权的宪法性地位,为失信被执行人隐私权的救济提供权利根基;另一方面,需要对救济程序进行改进,使过程更公开、透明,保障当事人的陈述权与申辩权,以实现救济。

After the implementation of the information disclosure system,the information of the person who has lost his trust has been overexposed and his privacy has been infringed upon.The violation of the privacy right t of the person who has broken his promise is not only due to the unclear provisions of the institutional entity,the excessive discretion in the hands of the court,the limited role of the relief procedure,but also the absence of the privacy right in the constitution.In order to eliminate the negative influence brought by this system,on the one hand,it is necessary to improve the entity of this system,establish the constitutional status of the privacy right,and provide the right foundation for the relief of the privacy right of the person who has broken the promise.On the other hand,the remedy procedure needs to be improved to make the process more open and transparent,and guarantee the right of presentation and right of defense of the parties,so as to realize the remedy.