期刊文献+

CCS、DHS-B治疗股骨颈骨折的近远期疗效差异分析 被引量:2

Analysis of Short-term Efficacy and Long-term Efficacy of CCS and DHS-B in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析空心加压螺钉(CCS)、动力髋螺钉螺旋刀片(DHS-B)治疗股骨颈骨折的近远期疗效差异。方法回顾性分析2017年12月~2018年12月我院收治的80例股骨颈骨折患者的临床资料,根据治疗方式的不同分为对照组(n=40)和观察组(n=40),对照组采用CCS治疗,观察组采用DHS-B治疗,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、髋关节功能(Harris)评分及并发症发生率。结果观察组手术、住院时间均短于对照组,术中出血量多于对照组(P<0.05);两组术后1个月Harris评分均无显著差异(P>0.05),观察组术后12个月Harris评分显著高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率为7.50%显著低于对照组的32.50%(P<0.05)。结论 CCS、DHS-B治疗股骨颈骨折的近期疗效相当,CCS手术及住院时间较短,术中出血量少,DHS-B远期疗效较好,且安全性较高。 Objective To analyze the short-term efficacy and long-term efficacy of cannulated compression screws(CCS) and dynamic hip screw blades(DHS-B) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Methods The clinical data of 80 patients with femoral neck fractures admitted to our hospital from December 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different treatment methods, they were divided into control group(n=40) and observation group(n=40). Control group was treated with CCS, and observation group was treated with DHS-B. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, hip function score(Harris) score and incidence rate of complications were compared between the two groups. Results The operative time and hospital stay in observation group were shorter than those in control group, and the intraoperative blood loss was more than that in control group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the Harris score at 1 month after operation between the two groups(P>0.05), and the Harris score at 12 months after operation in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group(P<0.05). The incidence rate of complications in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group(7.50% vs 32.50%)(P<0.05). Conclusion CCS and DHS-B have similar short-term effects in the treatment of femoral neck fractures, and CCS has shorter operative time and hospital stay and less intraoperative blood loss, and DHS-B has better long-term efficacy and higher safety.
作者 杨广杰 陈有 王永胜 YANG Guang-jie;CHEN You;WANG Yong-sheng(Department of Orthopaedics,The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University,Kaifeng 475000,Henan Province,China)
出处 《罕少疾病杂志》 2020年第2期62-63,110,共3页 Journal of Rare and Uncommon Diseases
基金 河南省教育厅科学技术研究重点项目(编号:15A320052)。
关键词 股骨颈骨折 CCS DHS-B 近远期疗效 Femoral Neck Fractures CCS DHS-B Short-term Efficacy and Long-term Efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献48

  • 1徐文华,曹盛生,袁晓军,李俊宁,傅宇.双头加压螺钉联合药物治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨颈骨折疗效观察[J].江西医药,2013,48(5):413-414. 被引量:4
  • 2Blai.,B,谢利民.股骨颈基底骨折三种内固定方法的生物力学研究[J].中国中医骨伤科,1995,3(3):61-63. 被引量:3
  • 3戴克戎,董凡,王以友,唐坚.人工股骨头置换术治疗股骨颈新鲜骨折的临床评价[J].中华骨科杂志,1995,15(3):133-135. 被引量:133
  • 4武阳丰,谢高强,李莹,周北凡,张普洪,史平,任福秀,马兰艳.国人生活质量普适量表的编制与评价[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(10):751-756. 被引量:64
  • 5卡纳尔.坎贝尔骨科手术学[M].卢世璧,译.9版.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001:3756.
  • 6Min BW, Kim SJ. Avascular nesrosis of the femoral head after os- teosynthesis of femoral neck fracture [ J ]. Orthopedics, 2011, 34 (5) : 349.
  • 7Butt MF, Dhar SA, Gani NU, et al. Delayed fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures in younger adults [ J ]. Injury, 2008, 39 (2) : 238 -243.
  • 8Upadhyay A, Jain P, Mishra P, et al. Delayed internal fixation of fractures of the neck of the femur in young adults. A prospective, randomised study comparing closed and open reduction [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg(Br) , 2004, 86 (7) : 1035 -1040.
  • 9Yih - Shiunn L, Chien - Rae H, Wen - Yun L. Surgical treat- ment of undisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly [J]. Int Orthop, 2007, 31 (5) : 677 - 682.
  • 10Bout CA, Cannegieter DM, Juttmann JW. Percutaneous cannulat- ed screw fixation of femoral neck fractures : the three point princi- ple[J]. Injury, 1997, 28(2): 135-139.

共引文献231

同被引文献16

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部