摘要
Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy and eligibility of thumb-tack needle therapy based on meridian differentiation in treating cervical radiculopathy.Methods:A total of 70 patients with cervical radiculopathy were randomized into an observation group and a control group,with 35 cases in each group.Patients in the control group received thumb-tack needle based on conventional point selection,while those in the observation group received thumb-tack needle according to meridian differentiation.The visual analog scale(VAS)and clinical symptom scores in the two groups were compared before and after treatment,and the clinical efficacy of the two treatments was observed.Results:After treatment,the VAS score in both groups dropped significantly(both P<0.01),and the VAS score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.01).The clinical symptoms score in both groups dropped significantly(all P<0.01),and the clinical symptoms score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.01).The total effective rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Thumb-tack needle therapy based on meridian differentiation can reduce pain score,improve clinical symptoms in patients with cervical radiculopathy,and produce more significant efficacy compared with conventional thumb-tack needle therapy.
目的:观察揿针疗法分经论治神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效及可行性.方法:将70例神经根型颈椎病患者随机分为观察组与对照组,每组35例.对照组采用常规取穴的揿针疗法,观察组采用分经辨证取穴的揿针疗法.在治疗前后对两组患者的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分及临床症状评分进行评价,并观察两组治疗方案的临床疗效.结果:治疗后,两组患者的VAS评分均较治疗前降低(均P<0.01),且观察组患者VAS评分低于对照组(P<0.01);两组患者的临床症状评分均较治疗前降低(均P<0.01),且观察组患者的临床症状评分低于对照组(P<0.01);观察组的临床总有效率高于对照组(P<0.05).结论:分经辨证取穴的揿针疗法能够降低神经根型颈椎病患者的疼痛评分,改善患者的临床症状,疗效优于常规揿针疗法.
