期刊文献+

全球价值链重构的经济效应--兼论中美经贸摩擦的影响 被引量:16

The Economic Effect of Global Value Chain Reconstruction--Evaluating the Influence of Sino-US Economic and Trade Friction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2017年,中美关系发生了实质性变化,美国对华战略从合作走向竞争。新冠肺炎疫情下,中美关系更是面临新的不确定性,中美经贸摩擦将影响中美两国的经济,进而产生连锁反应,造成全球价值链的重构。利用2014年世界投入产出数据库(WIOD)和假设提取法,测算中美经贸摩擦和全球价值链重构对世界43个国家或地区的经济影响,并重点模拟中美之间贸易由国内供给替代对增加值和劳动力就业的最大影响。结果表明:第一,基准模型设定下,经济效应存在地区异质性,中国周边地区、美国周边北美自由贸易区受到的影响最大,反映了区域性生产网络的存在。第二,相对美国,中国受影响更大,增加值下降2.5%以上;其余受影响较大的国家有爱尔兰、卢森堡、荷兰;印度和欧洲大部分地区受影响较小。第三,中美经贸摩擦对每个行业的影响不同,受影响最大的行业为中国的家具制造业和其他制造业,计算机、电子和光学产品制造业,以及美国的航空运输业。第四,假设其余国家或地区卷入中美经贸摩擦,存在替代效应和全球价值链重构,部分国家或地区增加值和劳动力就业均上升,上升最多的为22.42%。建议深化实施"一带一路"倡议,主动与周边国家或地区开展经济合作,强化区域价值链的影响,同时积极培育和发展国内产业链。 In 2017,there existed fundamental changes in Sino-US relation;American strategy towards China has been changed from cooperative to competitive. Under the background of new coronavirus outbreak,Sino-US relation is facing more uncertainties;and Sino-US trade friction will have impact on the economy of these two countries,which will in turn lead to chain effects and the reconstruction of global value chain. The authors employ the 2014 world input-output database(WIOD)and the hypothesis extraction method to calculate the economic impact of Sino-US trade friction and global value chain reconstruction on43 countries and regions in the world,and focus on the maximum impact on the added value and labor employment when the trade between China and the United States is replaced by domestic supply. The results show that:(1)There is regional heterogeneity in economic effects under the setting of the benchmark model,the Asia-pacific region around China and the north American free trade area around the United States are most affected,reflecting the existence of regional production networks.(2)Compared with the United States,China is more affected,with its added value declining by more than 2.5%;the remaining countries most affected are Ireland,Luxembourg and the Netherlands;and India and most of countries in the European Union are less influenced.(3)Further analysis shows that Sino-US trade friction has different impacts on each industry;the most affected industries are China’s furniture manufacturing and other manufacturing industries,computer,electronics and optical products,and air transportation.(4)The authors assume that the rest of the countries are involved in Sino-US trade friction,substitution effect and the global value chain reconstruction exists,the added value and labor employment in some countries will rise,and the highest rate of that is 22.42%. The authors put forward that we should deepen the implementation of BRI,initially develop economic cooperation with neighboring countries or regions,strengthen the impact of regional value chain,and positively cultivate and develop domestic industrial chain.
作者 赵瑞娜 倪红福 ZHAO Rui-na;NI Hong-fu(University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488,China;Institute of Economics,CASS,Beijing 100836,China)
出处 《中国流通经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第5期48-61,共14页 China Business and Market
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目“中国产业迈向价值链中高端:理论内涵、测度和路径分析”(71873142) 国家社会科学基金重大项目“实质性减税降费与经济高质量发展研究”(19ZDA069) 国家自然科学基金重点项目“全球价值链视角下的国内区域分工与市场一体化研究”(71733003)。
关键词 中美经贸摩擦 全球价值链重构 投入产出分析 假设提取法 区域差异 Sino-US trade friction global value chain reconstruction input-output analysis hypothesis extraction method regional variation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献74

  • 1王亚飞.贸易摩擦研究文献综述——兼论中美贸易摩擦[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2006(4):38-44. 被引量:17
  • 2孙瑞华,张松丹.中、美贸易摩擦手段新趋势及其原因探析[J].特区经济,2006(9):180-182. 被引量:6
  • 3Chang, P., (2005) Protection for Sale under Monopolistic Competition," Journal of International Economics 66 (2): 509-526.
  • 4Dombusch, R., S. Fischer, A.Samuelson, (1977) "Comparative Advantage Trade and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Corrtinuum of Goods," American Economic Review 67 (5) : 823-839.
  • 5Grossman, G., and E.Helpman, (1994) " Protection for Sale," American Economic Review 84 (4) : 833-850.
  • 6Grossman, (J., and E.Helpman,, (1995) "Trade Wars and Trade Talks," Journal of Political Economy 103 (4) : 675-707.
  • 7Gomory, R.E., W. J. Baumol, (2000) Global Trade and Conflicting National Interests, Cambridge Mass MIT Press.
  • 8Haufbauer, G.C, J.JSchott, K.A., Elliontt, and B., Oegg, (2007) Economic Sanctions Reconsidered 3'edition, Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • 9Hertel, T.W., ed., (1997) Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications, Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Li X., Xu D.Q., (2011) "Quantifying the Impact of RMB Appreciation by CGE Model," Chino and World Economy 19 (2) : 19-39.

同被引文献193

引证文献16

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部