期刊文献+

“发展好的”与“好的发展”:新发展理念价值排序的选择可能 被引量:3

To Develop the Good and Good Development:the Possibility of Selection ofthe Value Ranking of the New Concept of Development
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “创新、协调、绿色、开放、共享”的新发展理念产生于对多种发展理念的比较、排序和提炼。在此过程中,对价值排序合理性的不同考量和安置引发了两种基本的路径选择,即“发展好的”与“好的发展”。“发展好的”以实证主义构筑其产生的解释基础,具有自然主义式发展路径安排的实践气质,体现为将“发展好的”等同于“可计算的发展”与“发展强的”,进而确定工具理性的合理性规定与现实逻辑的发展导引,并以短期物质利益为其外在刺激。不同的是,“好的发展”以对“发展好的”批判而出场,以价值理性重塑发展理念的合理性依据,强烈反对因工具理性极端演绎造成的发展异化,强调要注重发展的长期性、整体性与过程性。然而,“好的发展”也存在一定程度的局限性,主要体现为以发展的价值逻辑彻底置换现实逻辑,易陷入主观主义与抽象主义。新发展理念在对这两种发展理念进行积极审思的过程中实现了本质性超越,表现为以工具理性与价值理性的互补性融合为其合理性安置,既导引发展的价值逻辑与现实逻辑形成互补性统一,又建构起统筹发展现实与发展价值的综合性评价体系。 The new development concept of innovation,coordination,green,opening and sharing comes from the comparison,sorting and refining of various development concepts.In this process,due to the different consideration and placement of value ranking rationality,there are two basic choices of development path which are developing the good and good development.The developing the good builds its interpretation basis with positivism,and has the practical temperament of the path arrangement of naturalistic development,which embodies that developing the good is equal to computable development and developing the strong,and then determines the rational provisions of instrumental rationality and the development guidance of realistic logic.At the moment developing the good takes short-term material interests as its external stimulus.The difference is that"good development"appears with the criticism of the"develop the good",it rebuilds the rational basis of development concept with value rationality,and strongly opposes the development alienation caused by extreme deduction of instrumental rationality,and emphasizes the long-term,integrity and process of development.However,there are some limitations in the good development,mainly reflected in the fact that it is easy to fall into subjectivism and abstractionism due to completely replace the real logic with the value logic of development.The new development concept has achieved essential transcendence in the process of actively reviewing these two development concepts.The core performance is to take the complementary integration of instrumental rationality and value rationality as its rational placement,to achieve the complementary unity of value logic and reality logic to guide development,and to build a comprehensive evaluation system of overall development reality and development value.
作者 张彦 张登皓 ZHANG Yan;ZHANG Deng-hao(School of Marxism, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310028, China)
出处 《内蒙古社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第3期1-8,共8页 Inner Mongolia Social Sciences
基金 国家社科基金重点项目“新发展理念的价值排序与中国实践研究”(编号:18AKS010)。
关键词 新发展理念 价值排序 选择可能 好的发展 the New Concept of Development Value Ranking the Possibility of Selection Good Development
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献16

  • 1G. Macdonld, "Introduction.. The Biological Turn", in C. and G. Macdonald (eds.), Philosophy of Psychology, Oxford : Blackwell, 1995, p. 238.
  • 2D. J. Chalmers, "Absent Qualia, Fading Qualia, Dancing Qual- ia", in T. Metzinger(ed. ), Conscious Experience, Imprint Acade- mi, 1995.
  • 3D. J. Chalmers, "How Can We Construct a Science of Conscious- ness?" in M. Gazzaniga(ed. ), The Congnitive Neurosciences Ⅲ, MIT Press, 2004, p. 1.
  • 4D. J. Chalmers, "The Content and Epistemology of Phenomenal Belief", in Q. Smith et al(eds. ), Consciousness: New Philosophi- cal Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, §. 11.
  • 5[澳]大卫·查默斯.《勇敢地面对意识难题》,见高新民、储昭华主编.《心灵哲学》,第378-379页,北京,商务印书馆,2002.
  • 6D. J. Chalmers, "Does Conceivabiltiy Entail Poss bility?" in T. Gendler et al (eds.), Conceivabilityand Possible, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 194- 196.
  • 7D. J. Chalmers, "Consciousness and Its Place in Nature", in S. P. Stich et al (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind, Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, p. 131, p. 130, pp. 129--130.
  • 8D. J. Chalmers, "The Puzzle of Conscious Experience", in Sci- entific American, 2002, p. 100.
  • 9D. J. Chalmers, Consciousness and Its Place in Nature", in S. P. Stich et al (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind, Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, pp. 131 - 134.
  • 10D. J. Chalmers, "Absent Qualia, Fanding Qualia, Danicing Qual- ia", in chalmers@arizona. edu. , p. 22.

共引文献24

同被引文献17

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部