期刊文献+

ICU内脓毒性休克急性肾损伤患者肾功能恢复的影响因素分析 被引量:19

Analysis of factors influencing recovery of renal functions in septic shock patients in intensive care unit with acute kidney injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析可能影响重症监护病房(ICU)脓毒性休克急性肾损伤(AKI)患者肾功能的多种因素,以期找到能预测患者肾功能改变的影响因素。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2019年6月武汉大学中南医院重症医学科收治脓毒性休克合并AKI患者的临床资料。收集患者一般资料、实验室及临床指标。按照肾功能水平变化将患者分为肾功能改善组和肾功能未改善组,对比两组患者各指标的差异,将单因素分析中差异有统计学意义的指标进行岭回归分析;采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)及其95%可信区间(95%CI)分析各影响因素对患者肾功能恢复的预测价值。结果:共纳入323例患者,其中肾功能改善组195例,肾功能未改善组128例。单因素分析显示,肾功能改善组与肾功能未改善组间急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)、序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、心率(HR)、血清肌酐(SCr)、血尿素氮(BUN)、K+、白细胞计数(WBC)、中心静脉压最大值(CVP max)、中心静脉压最大值与最小值的差值(ΔCVP)、液体平衡量、血乳酸最大值(LAC max)、去甲肾上腺素最大输注速度(NE max)差异有统计学意义,将上述指标纳入岭回归分析显示,APACHEⅡ、SOFA、SCr、BUN、HR、WBC、液体平衡量、NE max是患者肾功能未改善的正向影响因素(t值分别为5.507、3.690、2.026、4.815、2.512、2.114、3.532、3.735,均P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,APACHEⅡ、SOFA、BUN和NE max的联合指标对脓毒性休克AKI患者肾功能的预测价值最高,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和95%CI为0.863(0.821~0.899),明显高于APACHEⅡ、SOFA、BUN、SCr、NE max等各单一指标〔AUC和95%CI:0.863(0.821~0.899)比0.755(0.705~0.801)、0.722(0.670~0.770)、0.738(0.686~0.785)、0.743(0.692~0.790)、0.748(0.697~0.794),均P<0.01〕以及APACHEⅡ、SOFA、SCr和NE max的联合指标〔AUC和95%CI:0.863(0.821~0.899)比0.825(0.799~0.865),P<0.01〕。结论:APACHEⅡ、SOFA、SCr、BUN、HR、WBC、液体平衡量、NE max是脓毒性休克AKI患者肾功能未改善的正向影响因素。联合APACHEⅡ、SOFA、BUN、NE max对患者肾功能是否改善具有较高的预测价值。 Objective To analyze multiple factors that may affect renal function in septic shock patients with acute kidney injury(AKI)in the intensive care unit(ICU),in order to find factors of predictive value for renal function change in those patients.Methods Septic patients with AKI admitted to department of critical care medicine of Wuhan University Zhongnan Hospital from January 2017 to June 2019 were enrolled,and the patients were divided into renal function improvement group and renal function non-improvement group according to their renal function change.Baseline,laboratory and clinical indicators of them were collected to conduct retrospective analysis.Comparing the difference of each index between the two groups,the statistically significant indexes in the univariate analysis were selected to perform ridge regression analysis.The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve and its 95%confidence interval(95%CI)were used to analyze the predictive value of each influencing factor on the recovery of renal function in patients.Results A total of 323 patients met the inclusion criteria,and 195 of them were divided into renal function improvement group while the other 128 of them into the renal function non-improvement group.Univariate analysis showed that,there was significantly difference in acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHEⅡ),sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA),Glasgow coma score(GCS),heart rate(HR),serum creatinine(SCr),blood urea nitrogen(BUN),potassium(K+),white blood cell count(WBC),maximum central venous pressure(CVPmax),maximum-minimum central venous pressure distance(ΔCVP),fluid balance,maximum lactic acid(LACmax),and maximum norepinephrine infusion speed(NEmax)between the renal function improvement group and the renal function non-improvement group.Ridge regression analysis of those indexes found that APACHEⅡ,SOFA,SCr,BUN,HR,WBC,fluid balance,and NEmax were influential factors of non-improvement renal function(t values were 5.507,3.690,2.026,4.815,2.512,2.114,3.532,3.735,all P<0.05).ROC analysis found the predictive value combining the APACHEⅡ,SOFA,BUN,NEmax was the highest[the area under ROC curve(AUC)and 95%CI:0.863(0.821-0.899)],which had a higher AUC than any of APACHEⅡ,SOFA,BUN,SCr and NEmax[AUC and 95%CI:0.863(0.821-0.899)vs.0.755(0.705-0.801),0.722(0.670-0.770),0.738(0.686-0.785),0.743(0.692-0.790),0.748(0.697-0.794),all P<0.01],and so did it when compared to APACHEⅡ,SOFA,SCr and NEmax combination[AUC and 95%CI:0.863(0.821-0.899)vs.0.825(0.799-0.865),P<0.01].Conclusions APACHEⅡ,SOFA,SCr,BUN,HR,WBC,fluid balance,and NEmax are the positive influencing factors for patients without renal function improvement.The combination of APACHEⅡ,SOFA,BUN,and NEmax had a relatively high predictive value for renal function recovery.
作者 何力 苏连久 张婧 彭志勇 He Li;Su Lianjiu;Zhang Jing;Peng Zhiyong(Department of Critical Care Medicine,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430071,Hubei,China)
出处 《中华危重病急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第2期199-203,共5页 Chinese Critical Care Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金(81772046)。
关键词 脓毒性休克 急性肾损伤 肾功能 影响因素 Septic shock Acute kidney injury Renal function Influencing factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献26

  • 1Ostermann M, Chang RW. Acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit according to RIFLE[J]. Crit Care Med,2007,35 (8) : 1837 - 1843.
  • 2Bagshaw SM, George C, Bellomo R, et al. Early acute kidney injury and sepsis: a muhicentre evaluation [ J ]. Crit Care,2008,12 ( 2 ) : R47.
  • 3Bagshaw SM, Uchino S, Bellomo R, et al. Septic acute kidney inju- ry in critically ill patients: clinical characteristics and outcomes [J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol,2007,2(3) :431 -439.
  • 4Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV, et al. Acute Kidney Injury Net- work. Acute Kidney Injury Network : report of an initiative to im- prove outcomes in acute kidney injury [ J ]. Crit Care, 2007,11 (2) :R31.
  • 5Chang CH, Fan PC, Chang MY, et al. Acute kidney injury en- hances outcome prediction ability of sequential organ failure as- sessment score in critically ill patients [ J ]. PLuS One, 2014,9 (10) : e109649.
  • 6Bagshaw SM,Lapinsky S,Dial S,et al. Acute kidney injury in sep- tic shock : clinical outcomes and impact of duration of hypotension prior to initiation of antimicrobial therapy [ J ]. Intensive Care Med,2009,35(5) :871 -881.
  • 7Suh SH, Kim CS, Choi JS, et al. Acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis and septic shock:risk factors and clinical outcomes [J]. Yonsei Med J,2013,54(4) :965 -972.
  • 8Plataki M, Kashani K, Cabello - Garza J, et al. Predictors of acute kidney injury in septic shock patients: an observational cohort study [ J ]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol,2011,6 ( 7 ) : 1744 - 1751.
  • 9Langenberg C, Wan L, Egi M, et al. Renal blood flow and function during recovery from experimental septic acute kidney injury[ J]. Intensive Care Med ,2007,33 (9) : 1614 - 1618.
  • 10Payen D,Lukaszewicz AC, Legrand M,et al A multieentre study of acute kidney injury in severe sepsis and septic shock:association with inflammatory phenotype and HLA genotype [ J ]. PLuS One, 2012,7(6) :e35838.

共引文献27

同被引文献140

引证文献19

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部