期刊文献+

透明与幽暗:爱弥儿与卢梭混合意象的教育学阐释 被引量:3

Transparency and Darkness:An Educational Interpretation of the Mixed Images of Emile and Rousseau
下载PDF
导出
摘要 与《忏悔录》类似,《爱弥儿》同样是卢梭本人的一幅自画像。爱弥儿作为一个卢梭想象出来的教育样板,其并不是一个透明的灵魂意象,而是隐藏着大量不容易被发现的幽暗底层。在爱弥儿身上,卢梭有意构造出各种叙事结构,以实现一种既真实又虚构的想象性演练。无论是爱弥儿与卢梭之间表层与潜在的复调关系,亦或卢梭与爱弥儿之间真诚与反叛的变形结构,还是两人之间基于恋母情结与造父意图的政治性血缘,这些都反复提醒我们在研究《爱弥儿》的一开始,不能忽视卢梭自身的人格特点和精神品质。爱弥儿既是卢梭的学生,也是卢梭的孩子,更是卢梭本人的颠倒。也正是在这样一种爱弥儿式卢梭与卢梭式爱弥儿的混合意象中,我们才可能真正捕捉卢梭的教育意图以及整部《爱弥儿》中各种隐遁的计划。 Similar to the Con fessions,Emile is also a self-portrait of Rousseau himself.As an educational model imagined by Rousseau,Emile is not a transparent image of soul,but implies a large amount of dark bottom which is not easy to be found.In the image of Emile,Rousseau intentionally constructed various narrative structures to achieve an imaginative exercise that is both real and fictional.No matter what kind of relationship between Emile and Rousseau,such as a superficial and potential polyphonic relationship,a distortion structure of sincerity and rebellion,or a political blood relationship based on the Oedipus complex and paternity intention,these clues have repeatedly reminded us that at the beginning of the study of Emile should not ignore Rousseau’s own personality and spiritual characteristics.Emile is not only Rousseau’s student,but also his child,and even the reversal of Rousseau’s self-image.It is only by grasping such a mixed image of Emile’s Rousseau and Rousseau’s Emile that we can truly capture Rousseau’s educational intentions and various hidden plans in the Emile.
作者 胡君进 HU Jun-jin(College of Education,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China)
出处 《教育学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第2期14-27,共14页 Journal of Educational Studies
基金 中国博士后科学基金面上一等资助“西方公民教育话语的演变脉络研究”(项目编号:2019M650087)的研究成果。
关键词 爱弥儿 卢梭 教育样板 混合意象 Emile Rousseau educational model mixed images
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献65

  • 1于尔根·厄尔克斯,徐守磊(译).卢梭与“现代教育”意象[J].北京大学教育评论,2006,4(1):46-64. 被引量:16
  • 2[法]卢梭.爱弥儿(李平沤译)[M].北京:商务印书馆,2006.289.307.306.
  • 3Kimball. ( 1995 ). Orators & Philosophers : A History of the Idea of Liberal Education. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
  • 4Aristotle. (1982). Nicomachean Ethics. 1177a-1179a, London: William Henemann.
  • 5Isocrates. (1982). Against the Sophists. Ed. and trans, by George Norlin. Cambridge: Havard University Press, 291-293.
  • 6Augustine. (1995). Against the Academicians and The Teacher. Trans. by Peter King. Hackett, 45.
  • 7李猛.指向事情本身的教育:奥古斯丁的《论教师》[A].教育与现代社会(思想与社会第七辑)[M].上海:三联书店,2009.
  • 8渠敬东.教育中的古与今[A].现代社会中的人性及教育[M].上海:三联书店,2005:3-17.
  • 9[法]涂尔干.教育思想的演进[M].李康译.上海:上海人民出版社,2006:262-281.
  • 10[法]蒙田.蒙田随笔全集[M].上海:上海书店,2006.

共引文献78

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部