摘要
分别应用历史地理学、文献计量学、问卷调查等方法进行评价和分析,在综合分析地域性中医学术流派的基础上,初步拟定"地域性中医学术流派评价体系"的一级、二级、三级评价指标和评价要素以及内涵解释,其中一级评价指标包括历史地理学属性和文献计量学属性。历史地理学方法、文献计量学方法适合于地域性中医学术流派的评价研究,在此基础上拟定的"地域性中医学术流派评价标准"初步得到领域专家认可,能够初步定性定量地客观评价地域性中医学术流派。
Methods like historical geography, bibliometrics and questionnaire survey were used to conduct evaluation and analysis. On the basis of comprehensive analysis on regional academic schools in traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), the first, second and third class evaluation indexes, evaluation elements and connotation explanation of "an evaluation system on regional academic schools in TCM" were preliminarily drafted. Among them, the first-class evaluation indexes includes historical geography attributes and bibliometric attributes. Historical geography method, bibliometric method are suitable for the evaluation and research on regional academic schools in TCM. On this basis, the "evaluation standard on regional academic schools in TCM" has been preliminarily recognized by experts. It can preliminarily and objectively evaluate the regional academic schools in TCM qualitatively and quantitatively.
作者
郜峦
王振国
张丰聪
GAO Luan;WANG Zhenguo;ZHANG Fengcong(School of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Anhui University of Chinese Medicine,Hefei,230038;Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine Literature,Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine)
出处
《中医杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2020年第8期686-689,共4页
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
中国博士后科学基金(2016M592240)。
关键词
地域性中医学术流派
历史地理学
文献计量学
大数据分析
regional academic schools in traditional Chinese medicine
historical geography
bibliometrics
big data analysis