急诊护理干预对心肺复苏后患者康复疗效分析

Analysis of the Effect of Emergency Nursing Intervention on Rehabilitation of Patients after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

目的探讨对心肺复苏患者给予急诊护理干预后获得的康复疗效。方法方便选择该院2016年3月-2019年4月收治的130例心肺复苏患者作为实验对象;数字奇偶法分组后探究每组护理方案。比照组(65例):创建基础常规方案展开疾病护理;实验组(65例):创建基础常规方案+急诊护理干预方案展开疾病护理;最终就两组患者康复疗效差异对比。结果实验组心肺复苏患者干预总有效率(98.46%)高于比照组(84.62%)差异有统计学意义(χ^2=8.044,P<0.05);实验组心肺复苏患者干预不良反应发生率(4.62%)低于比照组(20.00%),差异有统计学意义(χ^2=7.127,P<0.05);护理前,实验组心率水平为(41.11±1.23)次/min;动脉血压为(6.15±2.41)k Pa;焦虑抑郁评分为(2.75±0.49)分;护理后,实验组心率水平为(101.19±9.89)次/min;动脉血压为(9.02±3.23)k Pa;焦虑抑郁评分为(0.71±0.32)分;护理前,比照组心率水平为(41.26±1.29)次/min;动脉血压为(6.16±2.43)k Pa;焦虑抑郁评分为(2.73±0.46)分;护理后,比照组心率水平为(86.65±8.29)次/min;动脉血压为(7.29±2.69)k Pa;焦虑抑郁评分为(1.73±0.41)分;最终发现,护理前,实验组心肺复苏患者心率水平、动脉血压以及焦虑抑郁评分同比照组比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.678、0.024、0.240,P>0.05);护理后,实验组心率水平以及动脉血压高于比照组明显,焦虑抑郁评分低于比照组,差异有统计学意义(t=9.084、3.318、15.812,P<0.05)。结论心肺复苏患者于临床接受急诊护理干预后,对于干预效果、安全性提升,心率水平以及动脉血压水平提升,焦虑抑郁评分降低,均获得明显作用效果,最终对于心肺复苏患者康复进程缩短,奠定基础。

Objective To explore the rehabilitation effect of emergency nursing intervention for patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Methods Convenient selection of 130 cases of cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients admitted to our hospital from March 2016 to April 2019 were selected as experimental subjects.After the digital parity method grouping,explore each group of nursing program;Comparison group(65 cases):the establishment of basic routine programs to carry out disease care;the experimental group(65 cases):established basic routine program+emergency nursing intervention program to carry out disease care;finally,the difference of rehabilitation efficacy between the two groups was compared.Results The total effective rate of intervention in CPR patients in the experimental group(98.46%)was higher than that in the control group(84.62%).The difference was statistically significant(χ^2=8.044,P<0.05);the incidence of side effects of intervention in CPR patients in the experimental group(4.62%)Lower than the control group(20.00%),the difference was statistically significant(χ^2=7.127,P<0.05);before nursing,the heart rate level of the experimental group was(41.11±1.23)times/min;the arterial blood pressure was(6.15±2.41)k Pa;Anxiety and depression score was(2.75±0.49)points;After the nursing,the heart rate level of the experimental group was(101.19±9.89)times/min;arterial blood pressure was(9.02±3.23)k Pa;anxiety and depression score was(0.71±0.32)points;Before nursing,the heart rate level of the control group was(41.26±1.29)times/min;arterial blood pressure was(6.16±2.43)k Pa;the anxiety and depression score was(2.73±0.46)points;after nursing,the heart rate level of the control group was(86.65±8.29)times/min;arterial blood pressure is(7.29±2.69)k Pa;anxiety and depression score is(1.73±0.41)points;finally found that before nursing,the heart rate level,arterial blood pressure,and anxiety and depression scores of patients in the cardiopulmonary resuscitation group in the experimental group were compared with the control group The difference is not statistically significant(t=0.678,0.024,0.240,P>0.05);after nursing,the heart rate level and arterial blood pressure of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group,and the anxiety and depression scores were lower than those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(t=9.084,3.318,15.812,P<0.05).Conclusion After the patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation received emergency nursing intervention in clinical practice,they obtained significant effects on the improvement of intervention effect,safety,heart rate level and arterial blood pressure level,and the decrease of anxiety and depression score,and finally shortened the recovery process of patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation,laying a foundation.