摘要
目的:比较芩连泻痛配方颗粒与传统中药饮片汤剂的化学组成差异,以探索配方颗粒在临床上的应用前景。方法:采用超高效液相色谱法,以葛根素、大豆苷、黄芩苷、延胡索乙素、盐酸小檗碱及甘草酸铵等15种对照品作为对照,对芩连泻痛配方颗粒与传统中药饮片的75%甲醇溶液提取物的特征图谱进行比较。结果:对照品和供试品各色谱峰分离效果较好,方法专属性、重现性和稳定性良好。芩连泻痛配方颗粒与传统中药饮片特征图谱的差异不大,芩连泻痛配方颗粒组分均匀性良好。结论:芩连泻痛配方颗粒与传统饮片汤剂化学组成差异不大。
OBJECTIVE:To compare the chemical composition differences between Qinlian Xietong formula granules and traditional decoction pieces,so as to probe into the clinical application prospects of formula granules.METHODS:Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography was adopted,15 reference materials such as puerarin,daidzein,baicalin,tetrahydropalmatine,berberine hydrochloride and ammonium glycyrrhizinate were set as the reference substance,the chemical composition differences between the 75%methanol solution extracts of Qinlian Xietong formula granules an the traditional decoction pieces were compared.RESULTS:The results of chromatographic peak separation of reference substance and test samples were good.The method had good specificity,reproducibility and stability.The differences of ultra-high performance liquid chromatography between Qinlian Xietong formula granules and the traditional decoction was not remarkable.The component uniformity of Qinlian Xietong formula granules was good.CONCLUSIONS:The chemical composition differences between Qinlian Xietong formula granules and the traditional decoction was not significant.
作者
徐丹洋
张金星
王舒
武雯
王春霞
XU Danyang;ZHANG Jinxing;WANG Shu;WU Wen;WANG Chunxia(Testing Laboratory, Nantong Food And Drug Control Center, Jiangsu Nantong 226006, China;Dept. of Emergency,Nantong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Jiangsu Nantong 226001,China;Dept. of Pharmacy,Nantong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Nantong 226001, China)
出处
《中国医院用药评价与分析》
2020年第3期315-318,共4页
Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-use in Hospitals of China
关键词
配方颗粒
传统中药饮片
超高效液相色谱
Formula granules
Traditional decoction pieces
Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography