期刊文献+

结肠镜下不同电切方式的治疗效果及安全性研究

Study on the efficacy and safety of different resection methods under colonoscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着我国医疗水平的不断发展,对结肠直肠息肉的电切方式越来越多,为取得最好治疗效果的同时确保治疗的安全性,针对这一问题,提出结肠镜下不同电切方式的治疗效果及安全性研究。首先,研究结肠镜下不同电切方式的治疗效果。在此基础上,进行结肠镜下不同电切方式的安全性研究。通过对结肠直肠息肉的临床表现及恶变情况进行总结,致力于降低结肠直肠癌发病率及死亡率。 With the continuous development of medical standards in our country,there are more and more resection methods of colorectal polyps.In order to obtain the best treatment effect and ensure the safety of treatment,in response to this problem,different resections under colonoscopy are proposed.Study on the effect of treatment and safety.First,the effect of different resection methods under colonoscopy was studied.Based on this,the safety of different resection methods under colonoscopy was studied.By summarizing the clinical manifestations and malignant changes of colorectal polyps,we are committed to reducing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer.
作者 胡晓利 杨婕琳 Hu Xiaoli;Yang Jielin(Department of Gastroenterology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University,Zhangjiakou 075000,Hebei,China)
出处 《现代科学仪器》 2019年第6期147-150,共4页 Modern Scientific Instruments
关键词 结肠镜 不同电切方式 治疗效果 安全性研究 colonoscopy different resection methods treatment effect safety study
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献67

  • 1顾勇,何利红,和水祥.结肠镜检查前肠道准备清洁效果285例对比分析[J].武警医学,2007,18(3):211-212. 被引量:3
  • 2Hagit Tulchinsky,Osnat Madhala-Givon,Nir Wasserberg,Shiomo Lelcuk,Yaron Niv.Incidence and management of colonoscopic perforations: 8 years' experience[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2006,12(26):4211-4213. 被引量:6
  • 3唐保东,李媚,刘思纯,马博.西甲硅油乳剂在肠镜检查术前准备中的临床应用[J].热带医学杂志,2007,7(10):985-986. 被引量:17
  • 4Sung J J, Lau J Y,Young G P,et al. Asia Pacific con-sensus recommendations for colorectal cancer screening[J]. Gut,2008,57(8):1166-1176.
  • 5Rex D K, Imperiale T F,Latinovich D R,et al. Impactof bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonosco-py[J]. Am J Gastroenterol,2002,97(7) :1696-1700.
  • 6Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers J J,et al. Impact ofcolonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield ofcolonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness ofGastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study[J]. Gastrointest Endosc.2005 ,61(3) :378-384.
  • 7Eun C S,Han D S,Hyun Y S,et al. The timing of bo-wel preparation is more important than the timing ofcolonoscopy in determining the quality of bowel cleansing[J]. Dig Dis Sci,2011 ,56(2):539-544.
  • 8Lebwohl B,Wang 丁 C, Neugut A I. Socioeconomic andother predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality [J].Dig Dis Sci,2010,55(7) :2014-2020.
  • 9Hassan C,Fuccio L, Bruno M, et al. A predictive modelidentifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowelpreparation for colonoscopy[J], Clin Gastroenterol Hepa-tol, 2012 ,10(5) : 501-506.
  • 10Spiegel B M, Talley J, Shekelle P,et al. Developmentand validation of a novel patient educational booklet toenhance colonoscopy preparation [ J Am J Gastroen-terol, 2011,106 (5) : 875-883.

共引文献256

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部