摘要
萨班的《量理宝藏论》中不承认性相无限,认为识得名物关系时成立性相语词,否认性相的定义具备实有三法,认为应是断除直接相违的事反体;否认性相的缺陷为非总是性相等三种,认为具有过宽、过窄和不容三种缺陷。本文以上述观点为切入点,依据《量理宝藏论》及其注疏,并参考《集量论》《释量论》等古印度因明论著,全面且系统地分析了萨班关于性相的独到见解。
According to Tsad Ma Rigs Gter,Sakya Pandita didn't admit the infinite Mtshan Nyid,but admitted that it is completed when the relationship between name and object is known.He also denied the definition of Mtshan Nyid should have three substance laws,but admits the definition of Mtshan Nyid should be the object that eliminates its direct contradiction.Nor did he admit the defects of the Mtshan Nyid are not always Mtshan Nyid,etc.but admits being too wide,too narrow and incompatible are the three defects of Mtshan Nyid.To clarify his view on Mtshan Nyid,this paper is based on Tsad Ma Rigs Gter and it’s explanations,and also refers to Dharmakirti's Tshad Ma Rnam'grel and other ancient Indian works of epistemology,and analyzed Sakya Pandita’s unique viewpoint on Mtshan-Nyid comprehensively and systematically.
作者
完德杰
Ban De Skyab(School of Tibetan Language and Culture at Northwest Minzu University,Lanzhou,Gansu,730030)
出处
《青海民族大学学报(藏文版)》
2019年第4期44-55,共12页
Journal of qinghai minzu University:Tibetan Version
关键词
量理宝藏论
性相的定义
性相的缺陷
Tsad Ma Rigs Gter
Definition of Mtshan Nyid
Defects of the Mtshan Nyid