期刊文献+

对奥斯本《愤怒的回顾》中人物对话的语用文体学解读 被引量:1

Pragmatic Stylistics Analysis of the Dialogues in Osborne's Look Back in Anger
下载PDF
导出
摘要 婚姻问题是一个社会问题的缩影。约翰 奥斯本的戏剧《愤怒的回顾》正是透过婚姻的外壳,反映了二十世纪五十年代二战后英国的社会现实。本文从语用文体学的角度出发,运用间接言语行为理论、语用策略和礼貌原则,对《愤怒的回顾》中人物的对话特点进行分析,旨在探究作者是如何通过巧妙地设计剧本中的对话来反映剧中人物的婚姻问题,从而揭露社会现实,表达对公正社会的向往。 Marriage is an epitome of social problems. John Osborne’ s drama Look Back in Anger reflects the social reality in Great Britain in the Post-WW Ⅱ epoch through the shell of marriage. From the perspective of pragmatic stylistics, this paper analyzes the characteristics of the dialogues in Look Back in Anger by adopting speech act theory, pragmatic strategy and politeness principle. The aim is to explore how the author skillfully designs the dialogues in the play to reflect the characters’ marital problem and further to expose the social reality and to express the author’s yearning for a just society.
作者 郑金金 ZHENG Jin-jin(Capital Normal University,Beijing 100048,China)
机构地区 首都师范大学
出处 《齐齐哈尔师范高等专科学校学报》 2020年第2期26-27,共2页 Journal of Qiqihar Junior Teachers College
关键词 间接言语行为理论 语用策略 礼貌原则 婚姻 社会问题 indirect speech act theory pragmatic strategy politeness principle marriage social problems
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

  • 1王丽琴.礼貌原则与女性交际语言风格优势[J].山东社会科学,2004(9):124-125. 被引量:8
  • 2Algeo, J. It's a Myth, Innit? Politeness and the English Tag Question. Ricks, C. & Michaels, L. (eds). The State of the Language. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.
  • 3Brown, C. What Discourse Analysis Reveals about Tag Questions. Paper presented at the Annul TESOL Conference, Detroit. March 6, 1981.
  • 4Brown, P. & Levinson, S. Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena. Goody, E.N. (ed.). Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction. New York: Cambridge University, 1978.
  • 5Fishman, P. Conversational Insecurity. Giles, H., Robinson, W. , & Smith, P. (eds.). Language: Social Psychological Perspective. Oxford : Pergamon Press, 1980.
  • 6Grice, P. (1967) Logic and Conversation. Cole, P & Morgan, J. (eds.). Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts. New York: AP. , 1975.
  • 7Lakoff, R. Women language. Butturff, D. and Epstein, E. L. (eds.). Women's Language and Style. Akron: University of Akron, 1979.
  • 8Leech, G. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman, 1983.
  • 9顾曰国.礼貌、语用与文化[M].外语教学与研究出版社.1992.
  • 10赵善青.从礼貌原则看性别语言差异[J].US-China Foreign Language,2009,7(5):10-13. 被引量:1

共引文献5

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部