期刊文献+

净现值和能源投资回报方法比较研究 被引量:1

Comparative Study of Discounted Cash Flow and Energy Returns on Investment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 油气资源勘探开发面临投资成本高、风险高、不确定性等诸多问题,传统的油气资源经济评价方法有净现值法、级差地租(矿利)法、储量成本法以及未广泛使用的勘察费用倍数法等,近年来国际上涌现了新的经济评价方法——能源投资回报(Energy Return on Investment)方法,这些方法在油气资源经济评价过程中各有优劣。从能源经济评价的理论和方法角度,阐述了净现值法和能源投资回报方法在实际应用中的优点和不足。在国际油气项目开发经济评价案例中,应该综合各种经济评价方法的优点,规避缺陷,建立动态的经济评价体系,为油气资源开发的时间选择、最佳开发方式、环境社会影响等重要投资决策提供科学依据。 Oil and gas resources exploration are facing many problems such as high investment costs risks and large uncertainties.Traditional evaluation methods for oil&gas resources include the Net Present Value,Differential Rents,Reserve Cost method,and Multiple Cost method.Energy Return on Investment is a new economic evaluation method.These methods have their own advantages and disadvantages.This article expounds the advantages,and shortcomings of different methods in practical application.However,the shortcomings should be avoided to establish a dynamic economic evaluation system when implementing various economic evaluation methods.The purpose is to provide the right time selection as well as environmental and social impact under a scientific basis for oil and gas resource development.
作者 闫君 冯连勇 熊苡 杨桂荣 ПоповаЛюдмила Yan Jun;Feng Lianyong;Xiong Yi;Yang Guirong;Lyudmila Popova(School of Business Administration,China University of Petroleum(Beijing),Beijing,102249,China;School of Economics,St.Petersburg State University,St.Petersburg,199034,Russia;China National Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Ltd Corporation,Beijing,100034,China)
出处 《天然气与石油》 2020年第2期126-130,共5页 Natural Gas and Oil
基金 国家自然基金项目(71874202/71874201)。
关键词 经济评价 净现值 能源投资回报 Economic evaluation Net present value Return on energy investment
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1潘继平.我国油气资源税现状及改革方向探讨[J].国际石油经济,2006,14(2):5-8. 被引量:15
  • 2张炜,钱瑜,王冉,肖微炜.能源投资收益率的研究进展及其应用前景[J].环境科学与管理,2007,32(2):1-4. 被引量:12
  • 3中华人民共和国企业所得税法[J].中华人民共和国全国人民代表大会常务委员会公报,2007(3):319-324. 被引量:9
  • 4Mohan Kelkar. Petroleum Economic Evaluation and Risk Assessment. The university of Tulsa, 1994(3)95~ 115
  • 5王雪梅等.国外大石油公司勘探开发成本分析.中国石油天然气总公司信息研究所,1998
  • 6Hall C. A. S, Cleveland C. J. , Berger M. Energy return on investment for United States petroleum, coal and uranium. In Mitsch W, editor. Energy and Ecological Modeling, Symposium Proceedings, Elsevier Publishing Company; 1981: 715-724.
  • 7Cottrell W. F. Energy and Society: The Relationship Between Energy, Social Change, and Economic Development [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, Book Company, 1955: 134- 136.
  • 8Odum H. T. Energy, Ecology, and Economics [J]. Ambio, 1973(2) : 220-227.
  • 9Hall C. A. S, Cleveland C. J. Petroleum Drilling and Production in the United State: Yield per Effort and Net Energy Analysis [J]. Science, 1981, 211: 576-579.
  • 10White L. A. The Science of culture[M]. New York: Grove Press, 1949.

共引文献41

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部