摘要
在《草房子》中,草房子房顶搭的是特殊的海边茅草,被描写为经历十多年后还显出金黄色,这不符合实际;砖窑的位置、大小、建成时间、产量等,都未做交代;细马卖羊只买红砖不买瓦,没有建成房子,让人心生疑惑。书中描写出行忽视交通工具,到镇、到县、到外省,往往都不提及角色坐车的经历;自行车在书中没有担当交通工具的功能。《草房子》中对"住"和"行"的描写,是对现实的回避,对有力塑造角色手段的轻视,没有显示出现实主义小说的真实力量,反而彰显出作者不顾现实的诗意美化。
In The Straw House,the grass roof is made of special seaside thatch,which is described as showing golden yellow after more than a decade-it is not in line with the reality,as the location,size,construction time,output of the brick kiln have not been explained in the novel.The Xima sells the sheep only buys the red brick,but does not buy the tile(the beach thatch).No houses have been built,which makes people confused.The novel describes the experience of neglecting the means of transportation when traveling to towns,counties and other provinces;The description of"living"and"walking"in The Straw House is an evasion of reality and a contempt for the powerful means of creating characters.It does not reveal the real power of the realistic novel,but shows the author’s poetic beautification regardless of the reality.
作者
吴振尘
WU Zhen-chen(School of Preschool Education,Changsha Normal University,Changsha 410100,China)
出处
《特立学刊》
2020年第1期64-68,共5页
Teli Journal