国内外反兴奋剂对比研究--基于Citespace的知识图谱分析

Comparative Study of Chinese and Foreign Anti-Doping--Mapping Knowledge Domains Based on CiteSpace

以Web of Science核心合集和中国知网收录的592篇反兴奋剂研究主题的文献为研究对象,借助CiteSpace软件对国内外反兴奋剂研究发文趋势、作者、机构、研究热点及趋势进行分析。结果显示:体育领域反兴奋剂研究起于20世纪90年代,呈现缓慢起步、波浪式发展的研究趋势,研究高峰多集中于奥运会前后;国内杨彬龄是该领域的核心作者,但学者间尚未形成稳定的合作关系;国外没有突出的核心研究者,大多较为均衡,且合作关系较为密集;国内研究机构以北京体育大学和湘潭大学为核心,但各机构之间缺乏合作,多以独立研究为主;国外以哥本哈根大学为核心,且较多机构合作紧密;我国学者在反兴奋剂的社会文化学、法理学等层面有着丰富的学术理论探讨,国外更注重于兴奋剂检测技术的开发与实践。建议国内学者、机构之间加强合作,进一步提高高产作者和高产机构的数量,鼓励研究人员从不同角度对反兴奋剂问题进行关注与研究,聚焦于高水平运动员的调查、检测技术的实证研究、社会心理学调研等前沿问题。

Taking the core collection of Web of science and the 592 papers on anti-doping research collected by CNNIC as the research objects, the research trends, authors, institutions, research hotspots and trends of anti-doping research at home and abroad were analyzed with the help of CiteSpace software. The results showed that the anti-doping research in the field of sports started in the 1990s,showing a trend of slow start and wavy development. Domestic Yang binling was the core author in this field, but the stable cooperative relationship between scholars had not been formed. There were more foreign core authors, and the cooperative relationship was more intensive. Domestic research institutions were centered on Beijing sport university and xiangtan university, but there was a lack of cooperation among them, and most of them focused on independent research. Abroad, the university of Copenhagen was the core, and many institutions cooperated closely. Chinese scholars had rich academic discussions on anti-doping in the aspects of sociocultural chemistry and jurisprudence, while foreign countries paid more attention to the development and practice of doping detection technology. It is suggested that domestic scholars and institutions should strengthen cooperation, further increase the number of productive authors and productive institutions, and encourage researchers to study anti-doping issues from different perspectives, focus on the investigation of high-level athletes, empirical research on testing technology, social psychology research and other cutting-edge issues.