期刊文献+

中日高等教育质量评价机制比较研究 被引量:1

A Comparative Study on the Evaluation Mechanism of Higher Education Quality Between China and Japan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学而完备的评价机制是促进高等教育质量发展的前置导向力和后续推动力。对比中日两国,高等教育质量的内涵经历了相似的演变过程,表现为单一到多元的推进。日本外部制度性评价基于大学的自我评价,并关照评价对象的客观性和动态性,而我国以政府和第三方外部评价为特色的评价机制,在评价主体、评价对象和评价方法上均与日本存在较大差异。分析这些异同点,有助于优化我国高等教育质量评价机制,不断提高评价方法的灵活性和针对性,弥合高等教育发展的目标与现实之间的裂痕,促进我国高等教育的内涵式发展。 The scientific and complete evaluation mechanism is the pre guidance and follow-up promotion of the quality development of higher education.Comparing the evaluation mechanism of China and Japan,the connotation of higher education quality has experienced a similar evolution,which is manifested in a single to multiple advancement.Japan’s external institutional evaluation is based on the university’s self-evaluation,taking into account the objectivity and dynamics of the evaluation objects,and continously improving the flexibility and pertinence of the evaluation methods.China’s evaluation mechanism,which is characterized by the external evaluation of the government and the third party,is quite different from Japan in the subject,object and method of evaluation.Analyzing these similarities and differences will help to optimize the evaluation mechanism of higher education’s quality in China,bridge the gap between the goal and reality of higher education development,and promote the connotative development of higher education in China.
作者 丁红卫 唐滢 曹甜甜 DING Hong-wei;TANG Ying;CAO Tian-tian(Office of International Cooperation and Exchange,Yunnan Agricultural University,Kunming 650201,China;Principal Office,Yunnan Agricultural University,Kunming 650201,China;School of Marxism,Yunnan Agricultural University,Kunming 650201,China;School of Marxism,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
出处 《西南交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2020年第3期46-52,共7页 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)
基金 云南省省院省校教育合作项目“云南‘南向’跨境教育研究”(SYSX201712) 云南省哲学社会科学“云南高等教育面向东南亚开放研究”创新团队“高等教育对外开放”(云社联〔2013〕17号)。
关键词 中日高等教育 教育质量 比较研究 评价机制 higher education in China and Japan quality education comparative study evaluation mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献40

共引文献303

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部