期刊文献+

标准化制片法在前列腺根治切除术标本病理诊断及Gleason评分中的应用价值 被引量:1

Application of standardized procedure of pathological sections of radical prostatectomy in pathological diagnosis and Gleason score
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的本研究旨在分析前列腺根治切除术标本HE制片流程中影响病理诊断以及Gleason评分的因素,探讨标准化制片流程在根治性前列腺癌病理诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性收集2018-01—2018-05北京协和医院病理诊断为前列腺癌,并已明确Gleason分级的根治性前列腺切除术(radical prostatectomy,RP)23例,共1200张HE切片,选取医嘱为重切的HE切片共250张,全部使用全自动切片机采用标准化流程重新制片。比较两种制片流程,分别统计优片率和重切率。结果全自动切片机标准化流程制片法切面完整,厚薄适中,少刀痕、皱褶及颤痕;优片率高(99.2%),重切率低(0.8%)。结论全自动切片机标准化流程制作的HE切片优于手动切片机非标准化的HE切片,在根治性前列腺癌病理诊断中具有实际的应用价值,有助于根治性前列腺癌病理诊断及Gleason评分。 Objective To analyze the factors that affect pathological diagnosis and Gleason score in routine sections of radical prostatectomy tissues,so as to optimize the preparation process and further clarify the application value of standardized process sections in pathological diagnosis of radical prostate cancer.Methods Twenty-three patients,including 1,200 wax blocks,who received radical prostatectomy(RP)and diagnosed as prostate cancer with Gleason classification from January 2018 to May 2018,were retrospectively collected.Two hundred and fifty specimens included repeated slices.The 250 specimens were sliced with a fully automatic slicer following the standardized process section.The quality and re-cutting rates were compared and the rate of qualified slice and re-slice were calculated.Results The slices followed the standardized process section with complete section,moderate thickness,less knife marks,wrinkles and chatter marks.The rate of qualified slices was high(99.2%),while the re-cut rate was low(0.8%).Conclusion The routine section prepared by the standardized procedure is superior to non-standardized procedure which has practical application value in the pathological diagnosis of radical prostate cancer and Gleason score.
作者 李梅 陈龙云 张志文 崔杰 师晓华 LI Mei;CHEN Long-yun;ZHANG Zhi-wen;CUI Jie;SHI Xiao-hua(Department of Pathology,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Science&Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China)
出处 《诊断病理学杂志》 2020年第2期71-73,共3页 Chinese Journal of Diagnostic Pathology
关键词 根治性前列腺癌切除术 HE切片 标准化流程 Radical prostatectomy H&E section Standardized process
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献41

  • 1Bostwick DG, Cbeng L. Urologic Surgical Pathology. 2nd ed. New York : Elsevier Mosby, 2008.
  • 2Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy : insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol, 1982,128 ( 3 ) : 492- 497.
  • 3Cheng L, Zincke H, Blute ML, et al. Risk of prostate carcinoma death in patients with lymph node metastasis. Cancer, 2001,91 (1) :66-73.
  • 4Cheng L, Slezak J, Bergstralh El, et al. Preoperative prediction of surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostateetomy. J Clin Oneol, 2000,18 ( 15 ) : 2862-2868.
  • 5Cheng L, Poulos CK, Pan CX, et al. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer ( less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostateetomy specimens. J Urol, 2005,174(3) :898-902.
  • 6Cheng L, Darson MF, Bergstralh EJ, et al. Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 1999.86 (9) : 1775-1782.
  • 7Cheng L, Jones TD, Lin H, et al. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Urol, 2005,174(6) :2181-2185.
  • 8Cheng L, Jones TD, Pan CX, et al. Anatomic distribution and pathologic characterization of small-volume prostate cancer ( < 0. 5 ml) in whole-mount prostatectomy specimens. Mod Pathol, 2005, 18(8) :1022-1026.
  • 9Cheng L, Koch MO, Juliar BE, et al. The combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 is the best predictor of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol, 2005,23 ( 13 ) : 2911- 2917.
  • 10Marks RA, Lin H, Koch MO, et al. Positive-block ratio in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent predictor of prostate- specific antigen recurrence. Am J Surg Pathol, 2007,31 (6) :877- 881.

共引文献48

同被引文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部