摘要
【目的/意义】研究高Altmetrics指标Top100论文的合作模式,同时,结合Altmetrics指标和传统文献计量指标全面评价学术论文的影响力因素,对于发展和完善Altmetrics计量系统至关重要。【方法/过程】以2016-2018年Altmetric Top 100论文为样本,对近三年的高Altmetrics指标论文的合作模式进行了统计分析,并通过合作模式和影响力指标来深入探讨合作模式指标与论文影响力之间的关系。采用描述性统计、相关性分析等方法综合探讨了Altmetric Top 100论文的合作模式对论文影响力的影响因素。【结果/结论】研究结果表明,高Altmetrics指标Top100论文的合作模式各有侧重;国家合作模式对U1(使用次数)有一定的影响,而作者合作和机构合作模式对论文产生的影响很小。最后,分析了这些高Altmetrics指标Top 100论文影响因素的原因并提出了相关的建议。
【Purpose/significance】Study the cooperation model of high Top 100 Altmetrics indicator papers. At the same time, combined with Altmetrics indicators and traditional bibliometric indicators to comprehensively evaluate the impact factors of academic papers, it is essential to develop and improve the Altmetrics metering.【Method/process】This study used the 2016-2018 Altmetric Top 100 paper as a sample to analyze the cooperation mode of the high Altmetrics index papers in the past 3 years, and through the cooperation model and influence indicators to deeply explore the relationship between the cooperation model indicators and the influence of the paper. In this paper, descriptive statistics, correlation analysis and other methods are used to comprehensively explore the influencing factors of the cooperation mode of Altmetrics Top 100 papers.【Result/conclusion】The research results show that the cooperation mode of high Altmetrics index papers has different emphasis;the national cooperation model has certain influence on U1. The author cooperation and institutional cooperation model have little impact on the paper. Finally, the reasons for the influencing factors of these high Altmetrics papers are analyzed and relevant suggestions are put forward.
作者
赵蓉英
余波
ZHAO Rong-ying;YU Bo(Research Center for Chinese Science Evaluation,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China;Center for Studies of Information Resources,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China;School of Information Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
出处
《情报科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第4期3-8,共6页
Information Science
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“构建中国话语权的评价科学理论、方法与应用体系研究”(18ZDA325)
国家社会科学基金项目“中国学者国际学术论文影响力评价研究”(16BTQ055)。