期刊文献+

面孔社会知觉内容模型与刻板印象内容模型的比较 被引量:3

A comparison between face social perception model and stereotype content model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在关于人的众多社会知觉内容中,存在一些潜在的基本维度。当前社会知觉内容模型中影响最广泛的是由Oosterhof和Todorov提出的面孔社会知觉内容的可信度和支配性两维度模型,以及Fiske等人提出的刻板印象内容的热情和能力两维度模型。厘清这两个模型的区别与联系有利于后续研究的深入与整合。本文从理论基础、研究领域和方法、维度和含义等方面对两个模型进行辨析,指出可信度维度与热情维度具有较高的相似,但支配性维度与能力维度存在较大差异,在此基础上对未来研究进行了展望。 There are some latent dimensions in the content of social perception.The most extensive influence dimension model in the current social perception study field is the two-dimensional model of trustworthiness-dominance of face social perception proposed by Oosterhof and Todorov,and the two-dimensional model of warmth-competence of stereotype content proposed by Fiske et al.To clarify the differences and connections between the two models is conducive to the in-depth analysis and integration of the follow-up research.This paper analyzes the two models from the aspects of theoretical basis,research methods and perspectives and dimension meaning,and summarizes that the trustworthiness dimension is very similar to the warmth dimension,but the dominant dimension is a little bit different from the ability dimension,and puts forward the prospect of future research.
作者 刘颖 吴琦 李曌 蒋重清 Liu Ying;Wu Qi;Li Zhao;Jiang Zhongqing(School of Psychological Science, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China)
出处 《辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2020年第3期63-67,共5页 Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 全国教育科学“十三五”规划课题(国家青年基金课题)“音乐训练促进汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童阅读的纵向追踪研究”(CHA190271) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“儿童汉字书写对阅读的影响及其认知神经机制”(17YJC190010) 辽宁省自然科学基金项目“情绪信息与性别信息集成加工的特点与机制研究”(201602454) 辽宁省教育厅项目“集成加工情绪信息与性别信息时交互效应成因研究”(L201683658)。
关键词 社会知觉 “大二”模型 可信度-支配性 热情-能力 social perception “big two”model trustworthiness-dominance warmth-competence
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献88

  • 1佐斌,张阳阳,赵菊,王娟.刻板印象内容模型:理论假设及研究[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(1):138-145. 被引量:88
  • 2Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis) respecting versus (dis)liking. Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of Competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55,473- 491.
  • 3Fiske, S., Cuddy, A., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of -soeial perception: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77 - 83.
  • 4Han, S. & Northoff, G. (2008). Culture- sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: A transeultural neuroimaging approach. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 646 - 654.
  • 5Heyman, G. D., Gee, C. L., & Giles, J. W. (2003). Preschool children's reasoning about ability. Child Development, 74, 516 - 534.
  • 6Judd, C. M. , James-Hawkins, L. , Yzerbyt, V. Y. , & Kashima, Y. ( 2005 ). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899 - 913.
  • 7Kay, A. C. & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effeetsof "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823 - 837.
  • 8Kenworthy, J. B. & Tausch, N. (2008). Expectations about the accuracy and stability of warmth versus competence traits: An intergroup analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1121 - 1129.
  • 9Kervyn, N., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2009). You want to appear competent? Be mean! You want to appear sociable? Be lazy! Group differentiation and the compensation effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 363 - 367.
  • 10Kervyn, N., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Demoulin, S., & Judd, C. M. (2008). Competence and warmth in context: The compermatory nature of stereotypic views of national groups, European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1175 - 1183.

共引文献89

同被引文献39

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部