民事诉讼中虚假陈述的类型化分析

Type Analysis of False Statement in Civil Procedure Law

在我国民事诉讼的审判实践中,当事人故意就案件事实进行虚假陈述、扰乱法庭的现象非常普遍。根据当事人作出虚假陈述的内容、形式等不同可做进一步的类型划分。我国现行民事诉讼法对虚假陈述界定模糊,也缺乏有效的规制措施,其主要原因就在于对虚假陈述类型的理论研究缺失。因此,应当在虚假陈述的类型分析的基础上,探索我国民事诉讼立法完善的应有路径。

In civil litigation,it is common for parties to deliberately make a false statement to confuse the court.The false statements can be divided into various categories according to different contents and forms.Nevertheless,the current civil procedure law in China ambiguously defines the false statements and there is a lack of effective regulatory measures.The main reason lies in the lack of theoretical researches on the types of false statements.Accordingly there is need to explore a proper path for the perfection of China’s civil lawsuit legislation on the basis of the type analysis of false statements.