摘要
目的对氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗用于支气管哮喘急性发作的疗效观察。方法选取本科在2014年6月—2019年6月收治的支气管哮喘急性发作患者96例为研究对象,将这96例患者随机分组,对照组和实验组各48例,对照组采用传统的超声雾化吸入治疗方法,实验组采用氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗方法,两组患者在治疗前后均进行肺功能检查,治疗期限为3天一个疗程,雾化吸入每天两次,将两组患者的疗效进行观察和比较。结果实验组的总有效率明显比对照组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗效果优于传统的超声雾化吸入治疗效果,氧气驱动雾化吸入疗效显著,雾化器体积小,可以做到单人单用,患者易于接受。
Objective Observation of patients with acute attack of bronchial asthma treated by oxygen driven atomization inhalation.Methods From June 2014 to June 2019,96 patients with bronchial asthma were selected as the subject of the study.The 96 patients were randomly divided into two groups,48 cases in the control group and 48 cases in the experimental group.The control group was treated with traditional atomization inhalation.The experimental group was adopted the oxygen-driven atomization inhalation therapy method.Pulmonary function examination was performed in both groups before and after treatment,The duration of treatment is three days,one course of treatment.Atomization inhalation twice a day,The curative effects of the two groups were observed and compared.Results The total effective rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The therapeutic effect of oxygen driven atomization inhalation is better than that of traditional ultrasonic atomization inhalation,oxygen driven atomization inhalation has a significant effect.The nebulizer is small in size and can be used by one person and one person,which is easy for patients to accept.
作者
张宗红
Medicine;Yankuang New(Mileage General Hospital,Zoucheng Shangdong 273500,China)
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2020年第7期74-76,共3页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
氧气驱动
雾化吸入
支气管哮喘
急性发作
疗效观察
肺功能
oxygen-driven
aerosol inhalation
bronchial asthma
acute attack
observation of curative effect
pulmonary function