期刊文献+

脊柱前路与后路内固定融合术治疗胸腰段骨折的效果比较 被引量:2

Comparison of effects of anterior and posterior internal fixation and fusion in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察脊柱前路与后路内固定融合术治疗胸腰段骨折患者的效果。方法:回顾性分析2016年10月至2018年11月收治的110例胸腰段骨折患者的临床资料,依据治疗方法不同分为观察组和对照组,每组55例。对照组予前路内固定融合术治疗,观察组予后路内固定融合术治疗,比较两组手术指标水平,治疗前后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分及并发症发生率。结果:观察组术中出血量少于对照组,手术时间短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后,两组VAS及ODI评分均低于治疗前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率为5.45%,低于对照组的10.91%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:脊柱后路内固定融合术治疗胸腰段骨折患者的效果优于脊柱前路内固定融合术治疗效果。 Objective: To compare effects of anterior and posterior internal fixation and fusion in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Methods: The clinical data of 110 patients with thoracolumbar fracture from October 2016 to November 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different treatment methods, they were divided into observation group and control group, 55 cases in each group. The control group was treated with anterior internal fixation and fusion, while the observation group was treated with posterior internal fixation and fusion. The levels of surgical indicators, visual analogue scoring(VAS) score, Oswestry dysfunction index(ODI) score before and after treatment and complication rate were compared between the two groups. Results: The intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was less than that in the control group, the operation time was shorter than that in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). After the treatment, the VAS and ODI scores of the two groups were lower than before the treatment, those of the observation group were lower than those of the control group;and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Further, the complication rate in the observation group was 5.45%, which was lower than that in the control group of 10.91%, and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). Conclusions: Posterior internal fixation and fusion is superior to anterior internal fixation and fusion in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.
作者 赵志明 ZHAO Zhiming(Department of Spine Orthopedics of People’s Hospital of Mianchi County,Mianchi 472400 Henan,China)
出处 《中国民康医学》 2020年第7期48-49,52,共3页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 胸腰段骨折 前、后路内固定融合术 胸腰椎功能 Thoracolumbar fracture Anterior and posterior internal fixation and fusion Thoracolumbar function
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献100

  • 1李勇,蔡林.脊柱结核外科内固定治疗的进展[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2012,9(3):24-26. 被引量:4
  • 2张建新,潘志军.两种不同固定方式治疗老年胸腰椎爆裂型骨折的效果比较[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(5):1403-1405. 被引量:13
  • 3施林军,曹扬,赵巍,林平,倪东亮.单节段椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床观察[J].浙江医学教育,2012,11(6):51-53. 被引量:7
  • 4黄洪斌,范顺武,鲍丰,季向荣.椎体成形术结合体位复位治疗创伤性胸腰椎骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2008,28(1):20-24. 被引量:26
  • 5Wood KB, Bohn D, Mehbod A. Anterior versus posterior treatment of stable thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit: A prospective, randomized study [ J ]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2005, 18(1): S15-23.
  • 6Dai LY, Jiang SD, Wang XY, et al. A review of the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures [ J]. Surg Neurol, 2007, 6?(3) : 221-231.
  • 7Alanay A, Acaroglu E, Yazici M, et aL Short-segment pedicle instrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures: Does transpedicular intracorporeal grafting prevent early failure? [J]. Spine, 2001, 26(2): 213-217.
  • 8Kramer DL, Rodgers WB, Mansfield FL. Transpedicular instrumentation and short-segment fusion of thoracolumbar fractures: A prospective study using a single instrumenta- tion system [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 1995, 9(6) : 499-506.
  • 9McLain RF, Spading E, Benson DR. Early failure of short- segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures. A preliminary report [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1993, 77(4) : 162-167.
  • 10Shen WJ, Liu T J, Shen YS. Nonoperative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit [ J]. Spine, 2001, 26 (9) : 1038-1045.

共引文献239

同被引文献38

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部