研究探讨冠心病心绞痛心内科规范治疗的临床体会

To Investigate the Clinical Experience of Standard Treatment in Department of Cardiology for Coronary Heart Disease Angina Pectoris

目的分析探讨冠心病心绞痛心内科规范治疗临床体会以及临床价值。方法选择2018年12月至2019年12月,1年以内在我院接受治疗的冠心病心绞痛患者100例,按照对患者治疗方法的不同分为对照组和治疗组,对照组(50例,仅进行常规药物治疗),治疗组(50例,采用常规治疗联合注射用血塞通)。治疗结束后分别对两组患者的治疗结果进行分析。结果两组患者皆有一定的好转,但是采用常规治疗联合注射用塞通的患者治疗总有效率明显高于对照组,并且不良反应发生率明显低于对照组的患者,P<0.05,数据有显著差异,具有统计学意义。结论关于冠心病心绞痛心内科规范治疗临床体会采用常规治疗联合注射用塞通的治疗效果更好,值得在临床借鉴运用。

Objective To analyze and discuss the clinical experience and clinical value of standard treatment in department of cardiology for coronary heart disease with angina pectoris.Methods A total of 100 patients with coronary heart disease and angina pectoris who were treated in our hospital within 1 year from December,2018 to December,2019.12 were selected and divided into control group and treatment group according to the different treatment methods.After the treatment,the treatment results of the two groups were analyzed.Results Both groups of patients showed some improvement,but the total effective rate of the patients treated with conventional treatment combined with ceton for injection was significantly higher than that of the control group,and the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower than that of the control group,P<0.05,with statistically significant differences.Conclusion The clinical experience of standard treatment in department of cardiology for coronary heart disease with angina pectoris is better than conventional treatment combined with injection of seton,which is worthy of clinical reference.