反思家事类商事纠纷之审判理路——一个“家庭主义”的分析框架

Rethinking the Jurisdiction of Family Commercial Disputes——An Analytical Framework of Familism

最高人民法院指导案例8号之判决无视案件发生的具体家庭情境,割裂了家事法的共同调整,其判决结果可能符合公司法法理却有悖家事法之情理,导致凯莱公司处于判而不散的反常识尴尬现状,减弱了本案的指导作用。这表明,家事类商事纠纷本身附着民事与商事的混合属性,当下审判理路并没有提供一个完备的解释路径,简单机械地将家事法与商事法割裂开来,忽视了家庭关系与商事纠纷之相关性,是一种应被诟病的法律形式主义之举。不论是从家事类商事纠纷自身特质还是公司法、公司的家事基因来看,“家庭主义”是无法忽视且也不应忽视的考量因素。为此,对于家事类商事纠纷,需复建家庭主义为核心的分析框架,解决策略上优先适用家庭内部规约和调解程序,同时注重对以女性为代表的家事弱势群体商事权利的保护,避免公司成为家庭成员变相压制的另一战场。

The judgment of the Supreme Court's Guiding Case No.8 ignores the specific family situation in which the case occurred;it separates the“common adjustment”of the family law;the judgment result“may”conform to the“legal theory”of the company law but has the“reasonableness”of the family law;KAI LAI company is in the status quo of“anti-common sense”that has not been dismissed;it also weakens the guiding role of this case.This shows that family business dispute itself is attached to the mixture of civil and commercial attributes;however,the current trial path does not provide a complete explanation path but simply and mechanically splits the family law and the commercial law,ignoring the correlation between family relations and commercial disputes;it is undoubtedly a legal formalism that should be criticized.Whether it is from the characteristics of family commercial disputes or the company law,the company's family genes,“familism”cannot be ignored and should not be overlooked.To this end,for family commercial disputes,the analysis framework with familism as the core needs to be reconstructed and the application of internal statutes and mediation procedures need to be prioritized in the resolution strategy.At the same time,it pays attention to the protection of the commercial rights of“wife”to avoid the company becoming another battlefield for family members to suppress in disguise.