论《水浒传》“怒气”摹写之“乖错”情理

On the“Misconduct”Emotional Reasoning of“Anger”in Water Margin

根据金圣叹的说法,《水浒传》写人叙事存在“名实抵牾,是非乖错”“褒贬固在笔墨之外”等现象。这在其“怒气”摹写上有着较为突出的表现。原作者及其评改者常常将含有乖错悖谬意蕴的“怒气”摹写置于被“激”而“愤怒”、突闻真相而“暴怒”等情理逻辑下,使之有声有色、顺理成章。凭着这些合乎人情事理的“怒气”摹写,《水浒传》有效地传达出“合理”与“乱法”乖错、“正气”与“魔性”乖错等悖谬意蕴,并传达出“怒处亦乐处”等特殊审美趣味。

According to Jin Shengtan,the narrative and character in the Water Margin has such phenomena as“faithfulness,misconduct”and“commendation beyond the text”.This has a more prominent performance in its“anger”description.The original author and his reviewers often put the“anger”description which with implied paradox meanings under the rational logic such as being“Irritate”lead to“wrath”,suddenly hearing the truth and“violent”,making it vivid and logical.Based on these humanistic and irritating“anger”descriptions,Water Margin effectively conveys the paradoxical meanings of“reasonable”and“chaotic law”,“righteousness”and“magic”,and conveys a special aesthetic interest,“anger is a unique pleasure”.