论毒品犯罪诱惑侦查的司法规制

Study on the Legalization of Temptation Investigation

2013年修改生效的《刑事诉讼法》第一百五十一条使诱惑侦查在部分案件得以合法化。但该条文规定过于原则,并未明确侦查的合法性标准以及适用该标准后具体情形的处理。实践中侦查机关滥用诱惑侦查的现象仍然存在,使得诱惑侦查这种侦查手段需要受到相应的司法规制。具体到毒品案件中,首先需要按照"分离式混合说"的标准,区分合法与违法诱惑侦查;其次需在程序上明确适用范围、对象,并建立完善的追责机制;最后严格适用非法证据排除规则,根据不同情形对毒品犯罪被告人作出无罪或者量刑优惠的判决,并对侵害的合法权益给予国家赔偿,确保行为人获得相应救济。

Article 151 of the Criminal Procedure Code,which was amended and came into force in 2013,legitimizes the investigation of temptation in some cases. However,the provisions are too principled,and do not clarify the legality standard of investigation and the treatment of the specific situation after the application of the standard,in practice,the phenomenon of abuse of temptation investigation by the investigation organs still exists,and this kind of investigation means make the temptation investigation has not been subject to the corresponding judicial regulation. Specific to drug cases,first of all,we need to distinguish between legal and illegal temptation investigation according to the criteria of"separate mixed talk";secondly,we need to clearly define the scope of application,object,and establish a sound accountability mechanism,and finally through the strict application of illegal evidence exclusion rules,according to different circumstances,the defendant of drug crimes shall be acquitted or sentenced to preferential judgment,and the state shall be compensated for the legitimate rights and interests infringed,so as to ensure that the perpetrator severs the corresponding relief.