期刊文献+

微创经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜治疗较大肾结石的疗效比较分析 被引量:5

Comparative analysis of the effect of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of large kidney stones
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究微创经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜治疗较大肾结石的疗效。方法选取2018年10月至2019年10月本院收治的50例较大肾结石患者,根据手术术式的不同分为对照组和观察组,每组25例。对照组选择微创经皮肾经镜取石术治疗,观察组选择输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗。比较两组手术情况、并发症、清石成功率。结果观察组术中出血量多于对照组,手术时间短于对照组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后并发症发生率(8.00%)低于对照组(36.00%),两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1个月两组清石成功率比较差异无统计学意义。结论在较大肾结石患者治疗中,微创经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术清石效果相当,但输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术并发症发生率相对较低,临床应依据患者的实际情况合理选择手术方式进行治疗。
作者 杨永生 吴克秋 段荣杰 彭光辉 金宇 Yang Yongsheng;Wu Keqiu;Duan Rongjie
出处 《当代医学》 2020年第15期174-175,共2页 Contemporary Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献49

  • 1李逊,雷鸣,袁坚,曾国华,单炽昌,郭彬,陈文忠,刘冠昭.微创经皮肾穿刺取石和经尿道输尿管镜碎石治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2004,19(7):388-390. 被引量:234
  • 2DE S, AUTORINO R, KIM FJ, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Eur Urol, 2015,67( 1 ) : 125-137.
  • 3FUCHS GJ. Complications of stone disease in the 21st century-- can noninvasive and minimally invasive treatment modalities improve the overall renal health of stone formers [J]. J Urol, 2014,192(5) : 1322-1323.
  • 4ZENG G, ZHAO Z, WAN S, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for simple and complex renal caliceal stones: a comparative analysis of more than 10,000 cases [J]. J Endourol, 2013,27(10) : 1203-1208.
  • 5CHOUAIB A, AL-QAHTANI S, THOMA A, et al. Horseshoe kidney stones: benefit of flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser [J]. Prog Urol, 2011,21 (2) : 109-113.
  • 6CHEW BH, ZAVAGLIA B, PATERSON RF, et al. A muhicenter comparison of the safety and effectiveness of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy in obese and normal weight patients [J]. J Endourol, 2013,27(6) :710-714.
  • 7LEE SH, KIM TH, MYUNG SC, et al. Effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopic stone removal for treating ureteral and ipsilateral renal stones: a single-center experience [J]. Korean J Urol, 2013,54(6) :377-382.
  • 8GIUSTI G, PROIETTI S, LUCIANI L G, et al. Is retrograde intra- renal surgery for the treatment of renal stones with diameters excee- ding2 cm still a hazard[J]. Can J Urol,2014,21 (2):7207- 7212.
  • 9PENG Y, XU B, ZHANG W, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones : is fluoroscopy-free technique achieva- ble [ J ]. Urolithiasis,2015,43 ( 3 ) : 265-270.
  • 10DE S, AUTORINO R, KIM F J,et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery:a systematic review and meta- analysis[J]. Eur Urol,2015,67( 1 ) :125-137.

共引文献236

同被引文献47

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部