期刊文献+

传统正畸方法和微型种植体支抗在青少年口腔正畸中的效果分析 被引量:12

Effect analysis of traditional orthodontic method and microimplant anchorage in juvenile oral cavity orthodontics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对青少年口腔正畸中传统正畸方法和微型种植体支抗所获的临床治疗效果进行对比分析。方法此次研究所纳入的对象,为我院接诊的104例青少年口腔正畸患者,患者的治疗时间在2017年1月~2019年3月,根据患者接受治疗方式的不同对其进行分组,常规正畸方法为对照组患者,微型种植体支抗患者为研究组,对比分析干预后的患者临床结果。结果研究组患者不良反应发生率明显低于对照组患者,而研究组患者的治疗效果以及治疗满意度则要远远优于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗4、8周后,两组患者的牙周组织骨保护素表达水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论青少年口腔正畸治疗中,采取微型种植体支抗治疗,其获得的临床治疗效果要远远优于传统正畸方法带来的效果,这对临床的治疗工作有着极为重要的意义。 Objective To compare and analyze the clinical therapeutic effects of traditional orthodontic methods and micro-implant anchorage in juvenile oral cavity orthodontics.Methods 104 adolescent orthodontic patients who were admitted to our hospitalfrom January 2017 to March 2019 were selected as subjects of this study.The patients were grouped according to different treatment methods,the control group were treated with conventional orthodontics,and the study group were treated with micro-implant anchorage.The clinical results of the patients after intervention were compared and analyzed.Results The data of patients in the study group showed that the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower than that in the control group,while the therapeutic effect and treatment satisfaction of the study group were far superior to those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After 4 and 8 weeks of treatment,there was no significant difference in the expression of periodontal tissues osteoprotegerin between the two groups,and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion After analysis,the clinical effect of micro-implant anchorage treatment in adolescent orthodontic treatment is far superior to that brought by traditional orthodontic methods,which is of great significance for clinical treatment.
作者 倪辉 贾岳 石志强 NI Hui;JIA Yue;SHI Zhiqiang(Department of Stomatology,West Hospital District of Shenzhen Hospital(Guangming),University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Guangdong,Shenzhen 518106,China)
出处 《中国医药科学》 2020年第8期280-282,296,共4页 China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词 口腔正畸 传统正畸方法 微型种植体支抗 牙周组织骨保护素 Orthodontics Traditional orthodontic method Micro-implant anchorage Periodontal tissues osteoprotegerin
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献130

  • 1姚文彦.微型种植钉支抗在口腔正畸中的临床应用效果分析[J].现代养生,2014,0(14):113-113. 被引量:3
  • 2高美琴,顾永佳,吴燕平,姚宁,陆建锋,王林.微螺钉型种植体支抗与传统强支抗在上颌前突正畸治疗中的对比研究[J].口腔医学,2007,27(9):466-468. 被引量:41
  • 3Serra G, Morais LS, Elias CN, et al. Sequential bone healing of immediately loaded mini-implants: histomorphometric and fluorescence analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137(1 ):80-90.
  • 4Luzi C, Verna C, Melsen B. Immediate loading of orthodontic mini-implants: a histomorphometric evaluation of tissue reaction. Eur J Orthod. 2009; 31 (1):21-29.
  • 5Janssen KI, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, et al. Skeleta anchorage in orthodontics--a review of various systems in animal and human studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(1):75-88.
  • 6Cornelis MA, Schemer NR, De Clerck H J, et al. Systematic review of the experimental use of temporary skeletal anchorage devices in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131(4 Suppl):S52-58.
  • 7Torcasio A, van Lenthe GH, Van Oosterwyck H. The importance of loading frequency, rate and vibration for enhancing bone adaptation and implant osseointegration. Eur Cell Mater. 2008;16:56-68.
  • 8Gritsch K, Laroche N, Morgon L, et at. A systematic review of methods for tissue analysis in animal studies on orthodontic mini-implants. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2012;15(3): 135-147.
  • 9Hoste S, Vercruyssen M, Quirynen M, et al. Risk factors and indications of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a literature review. Aust Orthod J. 2008;24(2):140-148.
  • 10Ireland A J, Soro V, Sprague SV, et al. The effects of different orthodontic appliances upon microbial communities. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2014;17(2): 115-123.

共引文献274

同被引文献86

引证文献12

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部