期刊文献+

急性冠状动脉综合征患者PCI术后抗血小板治疗的药物经济学评价 被引量:11

Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome after PCI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:从医疗服务角度,对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后两种抗血小板药物治疗方案进行经济学评价。方法:两种治疗方案为在使用阿司匹林基础上,经验性给予国产氯吡格雷,或经验性给予替格瑞洛,由此建立决策树及Markov模型并进行成本-效果分析,评价中国ACS患者PCI术后使用氯吡格雷和替格瑞洛的成本-效果。结果:经验性给予国产氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗方案为成本最低方案,但直接给予替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗方案具有较好的成本-效果。结论:对于PCI术后的ACS患者抗血小板治疗,最推荐直接采用替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林的治疗方案。 Objective:From the perspective of medical services,the economic evaluation of two anti-platelet drug treatment options after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)in patients with acute coronary syndromes.Methods:Two treatment options were based on the use of aspirin,empirically given domestic clopidogrel,or empirically given ticagrelor.Based on this,a decision tree and Markov model were established and cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to evaluate the use of clopidogrel in Chinese ACS patients and cost effectiveness of tigrelor.Results:Empirically giving domestic clopidogrel combined with aspirin was the lowest cost option,but direct administration of ticagrelor plus aspirin had a better cost-effectiveness.Conclusion:For antiplatelet therapy in patients with ACS after PCI,it is most recommended to use ticagrelor plus aspirin directly.
作者 张璐 范特 周伟 田会萍 任乐 董亚琳 姜明欢 Zhang Lu;Fan Te;Zhou Wei;Tian Huiping;Ren Le;Dong Yalin;Jiang Minghuan(Department of Pharmacy,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710061,China;Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy,School of Pharmacy,Health Science Center of Xi’an Jiaotong University)
出处 《药物流行病学杂志》 CAS 2020年第4期247-251,共5页 Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
关键词 氯吡格雷 替格瑞洛 急性冠状动脉综合征 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 MARKOV模型 成本-效果分析 Clopidogrel Ticagrelor Acute coronary syndrome Percutaneous coronary intervention Markov model Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1He J, Gu D, Wu X, et al. Major causes of death among men and women in China[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005,353:1124-1134.
  • 2World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control.The Atlas of heart disease and stroke[S]. Geneva: WHO, 2004.
  • 3Beaglehole R. Global cardiovascular disease prevention:time to get serious[J]. Lancet, 2001,358(9282):661-663.
  • 4中华人民共和围卫生部.中国卫生统计年鉴(2011)[M].1版.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2011:292-338.
  • 5Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology[J]. Eur.Heart J, 2008,29(23):2909-2945.
  • 6Task Force for Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of European Society of Cardiology, Bassand JP, Hamm CW, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes[J]. Eur.Heart J, 2007,28(13): 1598-1660.
  • 7Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/ non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Circulation, 2007,116(7): 148-304.
  • 8Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009,361:1045-1057.
  • 9Elisabet Nikotic, Magnus Janzon, Ole Hauch,et al.Cost- effectiveness of treating acute coronary syndrome patients with ticagrelor for 12 months:results from the PLATO study[J]. European Heart Journal, 2012,34(3):220-228.
  • 10Henriksson M, Epstein DM, Palmer SJ, et al. The cost- effectiveness of an early interventional strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome based on the RITA 3 trial[J]. Heart 2008, 94(6):717-723.

共引文献44

同被引文献110

引证文献11

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部