期刊文献+

肺癌化疗药学监护路径对化疗患者健康行为及生活质量的影响观察 被引量:7

Influence of Pharmaceutical Care Pathway on Health Behaviors and Quality of Life of Lung Cancer Patients with Chemotherapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察药学监护路径对肺癌化疗患者健康行为及生活质量的影响。方法:110例肺癌化疗患者随机分为两组,剔除脱落病例后对照组(常规临床路径管理)纳入48例,干预组(常规临床路径联合药学监护路径管理)纳入50例。记录两组患者化疗前、化疗2周期及4周期后健康行为以及生活质量评分;组间比较采用独立样本t检验,各指标不同时间点下变化采用重复测量方差分析。同时比较化疗期间两组患者的药品不良反应。结果:健康行为方面,经过2、4周期后,干预组健康行为各维度得分及总分均明显高于对照组(P<0.01)。经重复测量方差分析,两组患者各维度得分及总分比较均有明显差异(P<0.01);总分及各维度得分在不同时间点差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);除人际关系外,其余维度在干预和时间因素之间存在交互作用(P<0.05)。不同时间点两两比较,与入院时比较,对照组2周期后健康责任、运动锻炼、压力管理维度得分及总分明显升高(P<0.05);干预组2周期、4周期后各维度得分及总分均明显升高(P<0.01)。在生活质量方面,经过2、4周期后,干预组生活质量各维度得分及总分均明显高于对照组(P<0.01)。经重复测量方差分析,两组患者各维度得分及总分均有明显差异(P<0.05);时间、交互效应差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。不同时间点两两比较,与入院时比较,干预组2周期及4周期后各维度得分及总分均明显升高(P<0.01)。干预组恶心呕吐、腹泻、静脉炎及药品不良反应总发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:临床药学监护路径可明显改善肺癌化疗患者健康行为,提高患者生活质量,可保证患者治疗的安全性。 Objective:To investigate the influence of pharmaceutical care pathway on health behavior and quality of life in patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy.Methods:110 Patients with lung cancer for chemotherapy were randomly divided into two groups.The control group(48 cases)were received conventional clinical pathway management,and the intervention group(50 cases)were received conventional clinical pathway combined with pharmaceutical pathway management.In addition,health behavior and quality of life scores were recorded at the time of before and after 2 and 4 cycle chemotherapy,independent sample t test was used for inter-group comparison,and repeated measure variance analysis was used for variation of each index at different time points.And all adverse reactions during the study were recorded.Results:In terms of healthy behaviors,after 2 and 4 cycles,the total scores and scores of all dimensions of healthy behaviors in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.01).By repeated measures of variance analysis,there were significant differences in total score and scores of all dimensions between the two groups(P<0.01).The total score and scores of each dimension were significantly different at different time points(P<0.01).Except interpersonal relationship,the other dimensions had interaction effect between intervention and time factors(P<0.05).In addition,compared with the time of admission,the total scores and scores of health responsibility,exercise and stress management in the control group increased significantly after 2 cycles(P<0.05).Total scores and scores of all dimensions were significantly increased in the intervention group after 2 and 4 cycles(P<0.01).In terms of quality of life,the scores and total scores of all dimensions of quality of life in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.01).By repeated measurement analysis of variance,the scores of each dimension and the total score of the two groups were significantly different(P<0.05).There were also significant differences in time and interaction effects(P<0.05).In addition,compared with the time of admission,total scores and scores of all dimensions in the intervention group increased significantly after 2 cycles and 4 cycles(P<0.01).Meanwhile,the incidence of nausea,vomiting,diarrhea,phlebitis and adverse drug reactions in the intervention group was significantly reduced(P<0.05).Conclusion:The pathway of clinical pharmaceutical care can significantly improve the health behavior and quality of life of in patients with chemotherapy,as well as can ensure the safety of treatment for patients.
作者 徐象威 周美红 陈银巧 童群秋 朱佩祯 Xu Xiangwei;Zhou Meihong;Chen Yinqiao;Tong Qunqiu;Zhu Peizhen(Department of Pharmacy,Yongkang First People’s Hospital,Yongkang 321300,Zhejiang,China;Department of Mental Health,Yongkang First People’s Hospital,Yongkang 321300,Zhejiang,China;Department of Oncology,Yongkang First People’s Hospital,Yongkang 321300,Zhejiang,China)
出处 《药物流行病学杂志》 CAS 2020年第4期256-261,共6页 Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
基金 金华市公益类科学技术研究计划项目(编号:2018-4-154)。
关键词 肺癌 化学治疗 临床路径 药学路径 健康行为 生活质量 Lung cancer Pharmaceutical care Clinical pathway Pharmaceutical path Healthy behavior Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi.Increased burden of colorectal cancer in Asia[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology,2012,4(4):68-70. 被引量:19
  • 2Chen MY. The effectiveness of health promotion counseling to family caregivers [ J ]. Public Health Nurs, 1999,16 ( 2 ) : 125-132.
  • 3Recommendations for the framework and format of healthy people 2020. The secretary' s advisory committee on national health promotion and disease prevention objectives for 2020 [ K]. 2008.
  • 4Hurlbut JM, Robbins LK, Hoke MM. Correlations between spirituality and heahh-promoting behaviors among sheltered homeless women [J]. J Community Health Nurs, 2011,28(2):81-91.
  • 5Mohamadian H, Eftekhar H, Rahimi A, et al. Predicting healthrelated quality of life by using a health promotion model among Iranian adolescent girls: a structural equation modeling approach [J]. NursHealth, 2011,13(2):141-148.
  • 6Zhang SC, Wei CN, Fukumoto health-promoting lifestyles in workers in Japan [ J]. Environ 80-89. K, et al. A comparative study of agricuhural and non-agricultural Health Prey Med, 2011,16(2):80-89.
  • 7Lee RL, Loke AJ. Health-promoting behaviors and psychosocial well-being of university students in Hong Kong [ J]. Public Health Nuts, 2005,22 ( 3 ) : 209-220.
  • 8Pinar R, Celik R, Bahcecik N. Reliability and construct validity of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile Ⅱ in an adult Turkish population [J]. Nuts Res, 2009,58(3) :184-193.
  • 9Hulme PA, Walker SN, Effle K J, et al. Health-promoting lifestyle behaviors of Spanish-speaking Hispanie adults [ J ]. J Transcuh Nurs, 2003,14( 3 ) :244-254.
  • 10Cao WJ, Chen CS, Hua Y, et al. Factor analysis of a Heahh-Promoting Lifestyle Profile: application to ohter adults in China's Mainland [J]. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2012,55(3) :632-638.

共引文献4083

同被引文献78

引证文献7

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部